Guess who came up with the "Out of Africa" theory
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (60)
sorted by:
Guess who came up with General Relativity. You should boycott da Joooz by refusing to use GPS, which relies on it...
Jews invented GPS so we should ignore their constant need to destroy white nations with endless immigration!
It's funny how "da Joooz did it" is only relevant when it's something that you don't like.
It’s funny how whitey keeps pointing out the Jews constant subversion of white culture. Doesn’t anyone care that they made GPS!!!!!!
Please demonstrate how the 'out of Africa theory' subverts white culture. Thank you.
Thank God for GPS. It's so great for keeping track of critics of Israel and finding hospitals to bomb!
It’s not even humans keeping track or selecting which hospitals/refugee camps to blow up anymore, it’s fucking skynet being run on AWS servers (oh and they snuck in some blasphemy while they were at it):
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/dec/01/the-gospel-how-israel-uses-ai-to-select-bombing-targets
I'll never recover from ActOneSceneOne not liking me.
OK, let's break this down. Was Einstein the only guy in the history of the world that could've discovered general relativity? If so, him being Jewish is kind of irrelevant no?
If it's possible someone else would've discovered it, then how many gentiles were working in theoretical physics at the time? Quite a few. Is it possible one of them could've discovered it? Absolutely.
Now let's look at the other side. Did Jewish intellectuals found the concepts of cultural relativism, psychoanalysis, and Marxism? Yes. Did Jewish intellectuals advocate for mass migration into European nations? Yes. How many gentiles were thinking along these lines? Almost none.
Is it possible gentiles would have created these fictive ideas by themselves? Not really, no. The possibility is far greater that Jewish intellectualism was a necessary condition, not merely sufficient, for the formation of subversive concepts. These are all attacks from the outgroup on the ingroup.
Jewish individuals made up a majority of Bolshevik leadership. That would be over 2000% overrepresentation.
Poincare's "relativity principle" and Lorentz's transformation from one "local time" to another predated Einstein. Relativity was already discovered before the "theory of relativity".
Basically Einstein just sexed it up a bit. Like how Turing gets credit for the "universal computer" even though Church's lambda calculus is earlier and more useful - but Turing's Machine was an easier sell to the populace and he was pushed by special groups (the British and the gays), just like Einstein.
Well yeah. My point is not that it is relevant, it's that the Nazis only bring up Jewishness when it suits them. And they do it regardless of whether this could have been the only person in all of human history to come up with that idea.
Let's assume your framing. Were these the only people who could have come up with these ideas? Hardly seems likely.
Clever attempt, but you don't deal with how these ideas actually spread, and among whom. You can also not regard Marxism as emerging in a vacuum. It's the outgrowth of the French Revolution, as the whole idea of socialism itself was.
I'm not sure what you're basing this on.
It doesn't seem unlikely that people who are in an outgroup would come up with ideas that overturn established ideas. In case of the Bolsheviks, it's not at all surprising that the Jews would be with the people who were not staging pogroms. But you must admit that the people who post these things are not trying to make an intelligent, sophisticated argument like you are, but instead want to say "JEWS BAD". Which is why they bring it up when it's something they don't like and never when they do!
I doubt you're correct about this, but just to be sure: do you mean 'the Politburo', and if so, what year? Or as a whole? That is almost certainly incorrect.
This started when you countered an example of Jewish subversion with the achievements of Einstein. I'm explaining to you why that's a weak argument. Einstein certainly accelerated the development of theoretical physics, but many other people in his field were running in the same direction. Whereas in social sciences, for example, social Darwinism was the order of the day until Jewish thinkers like Boaz intervened and turned the bus around to cultural relativism, which undermines the orthodoxy of white, Christian, European countries.
The rest of your post is basically an argument from historical ignorance where you haven't read about investigations into Bolshevism, Marxism, etc. I would refer you to The role of Jews in the Russian Revolutionary movement by Leonard Schapiro, which plainly states on the first page that 50% of the revolutionary party membership was Jewish.
There are also contemporary writings from Churchill and other leaders that show they believed the Jews were leading the Bolsheviks. For example, he wrote the role of Jews in the revolution "is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others."
I believe there’s an interesting case to be made for a type of ancient communism which seems to have persisted through to the Classical era:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Marxist_communism#Classical_antiquity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primitive_communism#Example_societies
Can you substantiate how this is 'subversion', let alone 'Jewish subversion'?
Can you name a few? Not Fitzgerald or Lorenz, who were running in the exact opposite direction.
How very interesting. You don't have a problem with people subverting historic Christian doctrines with such piffle like 'social Darwinism', but you do care about one incorrect idea being displaced by another? Social Darwinism has more in common with cultural relativism than either have with anything that is related to Western civilization.
Well, you're moving the goalposts already. You said that 50% of the leadership of the Bolsheviks was Jewish, and all you presented was a not substantiated claim about the membership of revolutionary parties.
Furthermore, this happened in the summer of 1903, your article says. This was before there even were Bolsheviks, let alone a leadership of Bolsheviks.
That's very good and all, but there are actual documents showing who the leaders of the Bolsheviks were. You don't need to quote people, you can just point to the members, right?
Look, obviously Jews were overrepresented among Bolsheviks. But as soon as you made that claim, it being as sweeping as it was vague, I knew that you weren't right about it.
The irony is that the two Jewish members of the Politburo I know of voted against the October coup d'etat.
This has to be the most tortured argument you’ve ever written here. So he’s possibly or even probably right, but you think most of the people who agree with him don’t understand the nuances of why he’s right, and therefore… what exactly? He’s wrong? But you didn’t say that. And even if you had, you would have been engaging in a fallacy.
Further, you imply your belief that anti-Semitism simply falls from the sky. Negative opinion of Jews is always arbitrary and exists as a first order principle, animating and directing all subsequent opinions such that they are inherently invalid, yea? But then why do so many people across so many cultures and nations develop these opinions in mutual isolation? Why do people raised within intensely pro-Jewish cultures (as the West) spontaneously develop negative opinions about the Jewish ethnic cohort? Pattern recognition seems a far greater possibility than “muh papa didn’t like ‘em”.