This started when you countered an example of Jewish subversion with the achievements of Einstein.
Can you substantiate how this is 'subversion', let alone 'Jewish subversion'?
Einstein certainly accelerated the development of theoretical physics, but many other people in his field were running in the same direction.
Can you name a few? Not Fitzgerald or Lorenz, who were running in the exact opposite direction.
Whereas in social sciences, for example, social Darwinism was the order of the day until Jewish thinkers like Boaz intervened and turned the bus around to cultural relativism
How very interesting. You don't have a problem with people subverting historic Christian doctrines with such piffle like 'social Darwinism', but you do care about one incorrect idea being displaced by another? Social Darwinism has more in common with cultural relativism than either have with anything that is related to Western civilization.
I would refer you to The role of Jews in the Russian Revolutionary movement by Leonard Schapiro, which plainly states on the first page that 50% of the revolutionary party membership was Jewish.
Well, you're moving the goalposts already. You said that 50% of the leadership of the Bolsheviks was Jewish, and all you presented was a not substantiated claim about the membership of revolutionary parties.
Furthermore, this happened in the summer of 1903, your article says. This was before there even were Bolsheviks, let alone a leadership of Bolsheviks.
There are also contemporary writings from Churchill and other leaders that show they believed the Jews were leading the Bolsheviks.
That's very good and all, but there are actual documents showing who the leaders of the Bolsheviks were. You don't need to quote people, you can just point to the members, right?
Look, obviously Jews were overrepresented among Bolsheviks. But as soon as you made that claim, it being as sweeping as it was vague, I knew that you weren't right about it.
For example, he wrote the role of Jews in the revolution "is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others."
The irony is that the two Jewish members of the Politburo I know of voted against the October coup d'etat.
Well, you're moving the goalposts already. You said that 50% of the leadership of the Bolsheviks was Jewish, and all you presented was a not substantiated claim about the membership of revolutionary parties.
One thing at a time. Let us repeat, again, that a staggering 50% of the Russian revolutionary party rolls were Jewish. There is no Jewish defection or displacement from the revolutionary movement until Stalin excised Trotsky and other intellectuals, so in 1918 the number of participants, at the minimum, is the same in the Bolsheviks. In regards to the leadership, Jewish representation throughout history has been notoriously top heavy. For example, a survey in the 80s found that Jews are 60% of Hollywood decisionmakers. So if anything, we would estimate representation in Bolshevik leadership to be even higher.
You can't swat this aside, sorry. The fact that you even tried is laughable.
Let us repeat, again, that a staggering 50% of the Russian revolutionary party rolls were Jewish.
In a not substantiated claim, yes.
There is no Jewish defection or displacement from the revolutionary movement until Stalin excised Trotsky and other intellectuals
Partly true, but the 'revolutionary movement' was not just the Bolsheviks. There were also the Mensheviks (actually led by a Jew) and the Socialist Revolutionaries, who were divided internally between minimalists and maximalists.
so in 1918 the number of participants, at the minimum, is the same in the Bolsheviks.
Why 'at a minimum'? When you can empirically verify the actual leadership of the Bolsheviks, why on earth would you go on an unsubstantiated claim of a government official which is not even about the leadership?
For example, a survey in the 80s found that Jews are 60% of Hollywood decisionmakers
I am not sure what an unnamed study about Hollywood teaches us about the Bolsheviks from 2 generations earlier in a completely different country. For one, it's a very insulting comparison to the Bolsheviks - they weren't pedos and cocaine users.
You can't swat this aside, sorry. The fact that you even tried is laughable.
Actually, it's laughable that you made a claim about one thing and tried to prove it with something completely different (if unsubstantiated), and then dragged in Hollywood degenerates.
Can you substantiate how this is 'subversion', let alone 'Jewish subversion'?
Can you name a few? Not Fitzgerald or Lorenz, who were running in the exact opposite direction.
How very interesting. You don't have a problem with people subverting historic Christian doctrines with such piffle like 'social Darwinism', but you do care about one incorrect idea being displaced by another? Social Darwinism has more in common with cultural relativism than either have with anything that is related to Western civilization.
Well, you're moving the goalposts already. You said that 50% of the leadership of the Bolsheviks was Jewish, and all you presented was a not substantiated claim about the membership of revolutionary parties.
Furthermore, this happened in the summer of 1903, your article says. This was before there even were Bolsheviks, let alone a leadership of Bolsheviks.
That's very good and all, but there are actual documents showing who the leaders of the Bolsheviks were. You don't need to quote people, you can just point to the members, right?
Look, obviously Jews were overrepresented among Bolsheviks. But as soon as you made that claim, it being as sweeping as it was vague, I knew that you weren't right about it.
The irony is that the two Jewish members of the Politburo I know of voted against the October coup d'etat.
One thing at a time. Let us repeat, again, that a staggering 50% of the Russian revolutionary party rolls were Jewish. There is no Jewish defection or displacement from the revolutionary movement until Stalin excised Trotsky and other intellectuals, so in 1918 the number of participants, at the minimum, is the same in the Bolsheviks. In regards to the leadership, Jewish representation throughout history has been notoriously top heavy. For example, a survey in the 80s found that Jews are 60% of Hollywood decisionmakers. So if anything, we would estimate representation in Bolshevik leadership to be even higher.
You can't swat this aside, sorry. The fact that you even tried is laughable.
In a not substantiated claim, yes.
Partly true, but the 'revolutionary movement' was not just the Bolsheviks. There were also the Mensheviks (actually led by a Jew) and the Socialist Revolutionaries, who were divided internally between minimalists and maximalists.
Why 'at a minimum'? When you can empirically verify the actual leadership of the Bolsheviks, why on earth would you go on an unsubstantiated claim of a government official which is not even about the leadership?
I am not sure what an unnamed study about Hollywood teaches us about the Bolsheviks from 2 generations earlier in a completely different country. For one, it's a very insulting comparison to the Bolsheviks - they weren't pedos and cocaine users.
Actually, it's laughable that you made a claim about one thing and tried to prove it with something completely different (if unsubstantiated), and then dragged in Hollywood degenerates.
Excuse me? Are you going to substantially dispute the specific claim that 50% of the revolutionary party rolls were Jewish? How?