When Georgia passed a law requiring "NGOs" to report if more than 30% of their funding came from foreign sources - which I believe is milder than the US's FARA - the two Evil Empires, the US and EU, flipped out.
Not only do they want to control and manipulate other country's politics with the money they take from their taxpayers, which I have on good authority is Collusion(tm), but it also has to be secret.
What is the Italian navy doing?
As flawed as u/ger111 is, at least he is criticizing Wikipedia rather than taking it as Gospel truth as you did.
But I like that weeks afterward, you still haven't forgotten that blindly citing Wikipedia will get you criticized, as it should, as it will.
Comments are turned off
I'm glad they can't be compromised with, because you know the "right" would spineless as it is.
Troon cemeteries don't have crosses - suicides aren't buried in consecrated ground.
Let us repeat, again, that a staggering 50% of the Russian revolutionary party rolls were Jewish.
In a not substantiated claim, yes.
There is no Jewish defection or displacement from the revolutionary movement until Stalin excised Trotsky and other intellectuals
Partly true, but the 'revolutionary movement' was not just the Bolsheviks. There were also the Mensheviks (actually led by a Jew) and the Socialist Revolutionaries, who were divided internally between minimalists and maximalists.
so in 1918 the number of participants, at the minimum, is the same in the Bolsheviks.
Why 'at a minimum'? When you can empirically verify the actual leadership of the Bolsheviks, why on earth would you go on an unsubstantiated claim of a government official which is not even about the leadership?
For example, a survey in the 80s found that Jews are 60% of Hollywood decisionmakers
I am not sure what an unnamed study about Hollywood teaches us about the Bolsheviks from 2 generations earlier in a completely different country. For one, it's a very insulting comparison to the Bolsheviks - they weren't pedos and cocaine users.
You can't swat this aside, sorry. The fact that you even tried is laughable.
Actually, it's laughable that you made a claim about one thing and tried to prove it with something completely different (if unsubstantiated), and then dragged in Hollywood degenerates.
Oh, my apologies. I'm sure your knowledge is 100% accurate and true on all subjects, unlike us plebs with fallibilities.
It seemed you weren't saying "you're fallible like everyone else", but if this is your fallback position because you cannot actually name something, that's also good.
I'm sure I believe things that aren't true, because I'm a human being
Of course. We all do.
Go have a slap fight with someone else.
Let me remind you that you replied to me, not I to you.
How many January 6 "insurrectionists" were arrested by officers who feared for their lives when they kicked down the door and shot the dogs of the protesters?
I acknowledge the latter and make the further observation that this “Western” “ruling class” is disproportionately made up of that small group.
The ultraright version of: the Western world is controlled by WHITE MEN.
This reality demands a genuine, good faith explanation beyond “we’re smarter than you, goy”
Now let's be real, are all the people here who say "the Holocaust wasn't real but it should have been" interested in a good faith explanation?
Regardless, you made the same mistake as the woke in assuming that the default situation is equality. No, it is inequality. That is what is universal. That is why the Chinese in Malaysia outperform Malays massively, despite being discriminated against.
That explanation of mine cannot even be broached while the veil of ignorance surrounds the initial point of disproportionate and currently (within the Overton Window) inexplicable domination of this “ruling class”.
Unexplained to you, or others, is not quite the same as being 'inexplicable'. And having a disproportionate presence is not the same as 'dominating' the ruling class.
Instead of addressing valid concerns, the “ruling class” plays dumb, and always fans the flames. Clearly they aren’t dumb,
They're not dumb at advancing their own interests, but unfortunately, they don't care about the interests about the countries they wreck at all. If holders of capital say to let in many millions of immigrants, they will, because those holders are in a position to reward them.
Well, you bothered, and were just unable to post anything of substance. You're doing great.
Name a few.
However, we can’t neglect the fact that invaders are here only because the gates of Toledo have been swung wide open for them.
And for that, you'd rather scapegoat a small group rather than acknowledge the reality that the entire Western ruling class consists of traitors.
Whatever motivates that pattern must be unearthed and revealed in its totality (the root cause),
People with an undying hatred for a particular group are hardly impartial observers trying to 'unearth motivations'.
otherwise we just treat the symptoms, blindly (aka “you’ve got a cold? let’s get you intubated and on a respirator”)
Agreed. But the cause is not 'da Joooz are evil'.
Define 'vaxxer'.
This started when you countered an example of Jewish subversion with the achievements of Einstein.
Can you substantiate how this is 'subversion', let alone 'Jewish subversion'?
Einstein certainly accelerated the development of theoretical physics, but many other people in his field were running in the same direction.
Can you name a few? Not Fitzgerald or Lorenz, who were running in the exact opposite direction.
Whereas in social sciences, for example, social Darwinism was the order of the day until Jewish thinkers like Boaz intervened and turned the bus around to cultural relativism
How very interesting. You don't have a problem with people subverting historic Christian doctrines with such piffle like 'social Darwinism', but you do care about one incorrect idea being displaced by another? Social Darwinism has more in common with cultural relativism than either have with anything that is related to Western civilization.
I would refer you to The role of Jews in the Russian Revolutionary movement by Leonard Schapiro, which plainly states on the first page that 50% of the revolutionary party membership was Jewish.
Well, you're moving the goalposts already. You said that 50% of the leadership of the Bolsheviks was Jewish, and all you presented was a not substantiated claim about the membership of revolutionary parties.
Furthermore, this happened in the summer of 1903, your article says. This was before there even were Bolsheviks, let alone a leadership of Bolsheviks.
There are also contemporary writings from Churchill and other leaders that show they believed the Jews were leading the Bolsheviks.
That's very good and all, but there are actual documents showing who the leaders of the Bolsheviks were. You don't need to quote people, you can just point to the members, right?
Look, obviously Jews were overrepresented among Bolsheviks. But as soon as you made that claim, it being as sweeping as it was vague, I knew that you weren't right about it.
For example, he wrote the role of Jews in the revolution "is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others."
The irony is that the two Jewish members of the Politburo I know of voted against the October coup d'etat.
Well, it certainly “subverted” (or atleast was part of the effort to subvert) all the prior theories of human racial separation
So now 'subverting' previous theories is a terrible thing. Wait till you hear about plate tectonics.
Out of Africa” basically exists to subvert all notions of racial differentiation
I don't think it does, and even then, you'd have to show that this was the actual intent of the theory. Also, out of Africa or not, ultimately, all humans share the same ancestors - so why?
But one piece I’ll point to debunk the broadest strokes of the theory is to point to the up to 20% of the subsaharan genome which doesn’t appear in any other genome on earth (also referred to by the popsci label “ghost DNA”). Out of Africa has no plausible mechanism by which this reality could exist while also maintaining its core notions.
I don't care if it stands or falls. The claims made in this thread are strange at best though.
The country that invaded Iraq and killed a million people because of 'inaccurate information' is arresting "citizens" (the UK has no citizens, only pawns and subjects who pay for their own oppression) who for saying accurate things that the war criminals in power do not like.
China has a more moral government than this petty, barely viable terror state.
Was Einstein the only guy in the history of the world that could've discovered general relativity? If so, him being Jewish is kind of irrelevant no?
Well yeah. My point is not that it is relevant, it's that the Nazis only bring up Jewishness when it suits them. And they do it regardless of whether this could have been the only person in all of human history to come up with that idea.
Did Jewish intellectuals found the concepts of cultural relativism, psychoanalysis, and Marxism? Yes.
Let's assume your framing. Were these the only people who could have come up with these ideas? Hardly seems likely.
Clever attempt, but you don't deal with how these ideas actually spread, and among whom. You can also not regard Marxism as emerging in a vacuum. It's the outgrowth of the French Revolution, as the whole idea of socialism itself was.
Did Jewish intellectuals advocate for mass migration into European nations? Yes. How many gentiles were thinking along these lines? Almost none.
I'm not sure what you're basing this on.
The possibility is far greater that Jewish intellectualism was a necessary condition, not merely sufficient, for the formation of subversive concepts. These are all attacks from the outgroup on the ingroup.
It doesn't seem unlikely that people who are in an outgroup would come up with ideas that overturn established ideas. In case of the Bolsheviks, it's not at all surprising that the Jews would be with the people who were not staging pogroms. But you must admit that the people who post these things are not trying to make an intelligent, sophisticated argument like you are, but instead want to say "JEWS BAD". Which is why they bring it up when it's something they don't like and never when they do!
Jewish individuals made up a majority of Bolshevik leadership.
I doubt you're correct about this, but just to be sure: do you mean 'the Politburo', and if so, what year? Or as a whole? That is almost certainly incorrect.
I'll never recover from ActOneSceneOne not liking me.
Please demonstrate how the 'out of Africa theory' subverts white culture. Thank you.
It's funny how "da Joooz did it" is only relevant when it's something that you don't like.
The guy who creates this videos claimed that 'plastic pollution' is a real problem (which it is not) and that Mr Beast was therefore in the wrong for leading a cleanup crew rather than attacking companies like Coca Cola.
I'm pretty sure both he and Mr Beast are scum.
Which video essay?
The deaths can be stopped by firing on the ships.