You keep addressing arguments that I'm not making, claiming views that I don't hold, pretending I'm presenting a position that I'm not. I guess you're right, you're not attacking me.
Here's a hint for you: Win an argument by attacking the argument. Do not try and win it by attacking the person making the argument.
You're failing so badly that you're attacking a person you've devised in your head. You're not getting a defence against those attacks from me because they're nothing to do with me. You're holding an argument with your perceived bogeyman.
I'd have to be a compete and utter moron to make a big issue about the self-evident "sexting is not consent" to the extent that it destroys my credibility and people stop listening to me regarding actual issues that do need to be addressed.
The broader context also includes a massive drop in rape prosecutions and demands that rape victims shouldn't have to provide their phones or social media details to police. If the guidance is "acquire that evidence but use it sensibly" then I consider that a massive improvement on the situation at the start of the year.
I said to attack the argument. You're not even trying. You keep making baseless comments about things you want to think I do or believe in. You're wrong.
You were wrong which is why I engaged. You stubbornly insist on being intentionally wrong so I'm going to disengage. I shall merely finish with a simple statement that needs no context, that infers no other viewpoints, activities, behaviours or beliefs, and that you need to understand: Sexting is not consent.
You keep addressing arguments that I'm not making, claiming views that I don't hold, pretending I'm presenting a position that I'm not. I guess you're right, you're not attacking me.
Here's a hint for you: Win an argument by attacking the argument. Do not try and win it by attacking the person making the argument.
You're failing so badly that you're attacking a person you've devised in your head. You're not getting a defence against those attacks from me because they're nothing to do with me. You're holding an argument with your perceived bogeyman.
Maybe he'll come and respond.
I'd have to be a compete and utter moron to make a big issue about the self-evident "sexting is not consent" to the extent that it destroys my credibility and people stop listening to me regarding actual issues that do need to be addressed.
The broader context also includes a massive drop in rape prosecutions and demands that rape victims shouldn't have to provide their phones or social media details to police. If the guidance is "acquire that evidence but use it sensibly" then I consider that a massive improvement on the situation at the start of the year.
I said to attack the argument. You're not even trying. You keep making baseless comments about things you want to think I do or believe in. You're wrong.
You were wrong which is why I engaged. You stubbornly insist on being intentionally wrong so I'm going to disengage. I shall merely finish with a simple statement that needs no context, that infers no other viewpoints, activities, behaviours or beliefs, and that you need to understand: Sexting is not consent.