I'd have to be a compete and utter moron to make a big issue about the self-evident "sexting is not consent" to the extent that it destroys my credibility and people stop listening to me regarding actual issues that do need to be addressed.
The broader context also includes a massive drop in rape prosecutions and demands that rape victims shouldn't have to provide their phones or social media details to police. If the guidance is "acquire that evidence but use it sensibly" then I consider that a massive improvement on the situation at the start of the year.
Nobody said it was - what I said was that it's better evidence than a woman's claims. This policy basically says your crocodile tears and wild fictional claims are worth more than saved, impossible to edit evidence.
Everything you do is to make our lives harder, it's pretty obvious by now.
The massive drop is because "victims" (It's accusers - calling them victims is yet another showing of your blindingly obvious pro-women bias.) were always full of shit and refused to provide basic information that should be required for their claims to even be heard, let alone prosecuted.
They should have to provide phones, social media and political affiliation. Any evidence of feminism - case dropped. Feminists are dirty, lying scum who use these things as a weapon.
I said to attack the argument. You're not even trying. You keep making baseless comments about things you want to think I do or believe in. You're wrong.
You were wrong which is why I engaged. You stubbornly insist on being intentionally wrong so I'm going to disengage. I shall merely finish with a simple statement that needs no context, that infers no other viewpoints, activities, behaviours or beliefs, and that you need to understand: Sexting is not consent.
I'd have to be a compete and utter moron to make a big issue about the self-evident "sexting is not consent" to the extent that it destroys my credibility and people stop listening to me regarding actual issues that do need to be addressed.
The broader context also includes a massive drop in rape prosecutions and demands that rape victims shouldn't have to provide their phones or social media details to police. If the guidance is "acquire that evidence but use it sensibly" then I consider that a massive improvement on the situation at the start of the year.
Nobody said it was - what I said was that it's better evidence than a woman's claims. This policy basically says your crocodile tears and wild fictional claims are worth more than saved, impossible to edit evidence.
Everything you do is to make our lives harder, it's pretty obvious by now.
The massive drop is because "victims" (It's accusers - calling them victims is yet another showing of your blindingly obvious pro-women bias.) were always full of shit and refused to provide basic information that should be required for their claims to even be heard, let alone prosecuted.
They should have to provide phones, social media and political affiliation. Any evidence of feminism - case dropped. Feminists are dirty, lying scum who use these things as a weapon.
I said to attack the argument. You're not even trying. You keep making baseless comments about things you want to think I do or believe in. You're wrong.
You were wrong which is why I engaged. You stubbornly insist on being intentionally wrong so I'm going to disengage. I shall merely finish with a simple statement that needs no context, that infers no other viewpoints, activities, behaviours or beliefs, and that you need to understand: Sexting is not consent.