Bad assumptions, really? There's no group that loves talking about castration unprovoked more than radfems. You pretty much outed yourself as one by making that analogy, because it shows that hatred is always in your mind as the first thing you jump to.
Well, I don't agree. I think the credibility of a woman's claims against a man died when you made #KillAllMen hit trending every year since 2014, including during the Covid-19 pandemic, where men actually were dying.
A feminist with a verified check (not a random person, but an actual public figure) actually stated "The Coronavirus is not killing men fast enough.", this statement hit trending until even Twitter, notorious for their left-wing bias, had to take it down and reprimand her.
So, no. I don't believe that your worthless claims are worth anything and a lot of people would agree with me.
But it should supercede a claim made with zero evidence, which it did up until this point. As always, feminists wait until all the headlines are about the people dying from Covid-19 before they strike with their latest policy based solely on making men feel even more threatened than they already are.
What does show consent at this point? What can a man show to get away from a malicious accusation from a woman? What haven't you made illegal to use as evidence? Nothing. We're supposed to just believe in your benevolence, despite it being blindingly obvious that there isn't any.
And I know your next point as well - if you don't trust us, don't have sex - that's fair enough but you have to stop calling people incels then, hypocrites.
But it's not attacking you. I'm just not an idiot who genuinely believes in the good nature of your side. I'm calling you out for what you truly are.
I just find your game so sickening. You stack the deck hugely in your favor, censor everyone who hates you for it and then add onto that with constant mockery and dehumanization of anyone not willing to play.
You keep addressing arguments that I'm not making, claiming views that I don't hold, pretending I'm presenting a position that I'm not. I guess you're right, you're not attacking me.
Here's a hint for you: Win an argument by attacking the argument. Do not try and win it by attacking the person making the argument.
You're failing so badly that you're attacking a person you've devised in your head. You're not getting a defence against those attacks from me because they're nothing to do with me. You're holding an argument with your perceived bogeyman.
Am I though? I think I'm just cutting through your fake attempt at sounding sane.
I already did. Women's groups banned recorded video as evidence a while ago. They made it legal to murder men in 2018. They pushed for misogyny law in 2019. (Now slated for 2021, because God forbid we say anything about our oppressors before they beat us to death.) Now this in 2020? You'd have to be a complete and utter moron to not see what's going on, or just a disinformation specialist trying to play off naivety. I'm voting that you're the latter.
I'd have to be a compete and utter moron to make a big issue about the self-evident "sexting is not consent" to the extent that it destroys my credibility and people stop listening to me regarding actual issues that do need to be addressed.
The broader context also includes a massive drop in rape prosecutions and demands that rape victims shouldn't have to provide their phones or social media details to police. If the guidance is "acquire that evidence but use it sensibly" then I consider that a massive improvement on the situation at the start of the year.
Nobody said it was - what I said was that it's better evidence than a woman's claims. This policy basically says your crocodile tears and wild fictional claims are worth more than saved, impossible to edit evidence.
Everything you do is to make our lives harder, it's pretty obvious by now.
The massive drop is because "victims" (It's accusers - calling them victims is yet another showing of your blindingly obvious pro-women bias.) were always full of shit and refused to provide basic information that should be required for their claims to even be heard, let alone prosecuted.
They should have to provide phones, social media and political affiliation. Any evidence of feminism - case dropped. Feminists are dirty, lying scum who use these things as a weapon.
Bad assumptions, really? There's no group that loves talking about castration unprovoked more than radfems. You pretty much outed yourself as one by making that analogy, because it shows that hatred is always in your mind as the first thing you jump to.
Well, I don't agree. I think the credibility of a woman's claims against a man died when you made #KillAllMen hit trending every year since 2014, including during the Covid-19 pandemic, where men actually were dying.
A feminist with a verified check (not a random person, but an actual public figure) actually stated "The Coronavirus is not killing men fast enough.", this statement hit trending until even Twitter, notorious for their left-wing bias, had to take it down and reprimand her.
So, no. I don't believe that your worthless claims are worth anything and a lot of people would agree with me.
But it should supercede a claim made with zero evidence, which it did up until this point. As always, feminists wait until all the headlines are about the people dying from Covid-19 before they strike with their latest policy based solely on making men feel even more threatened than they already are.
What does show consent at this point? What can a man show to get away from a malicious accusation from a woman? What haven't you made illegal to use as evidence? Nothing. We're supposed to just believe in your benevolence, despite it being blindingly obvious that there isn't any.
And I know your next point as well - if you don't trust us, don't have sex - that's fair enough but you have to stop calling people incels then, hypocrites.
But it's not attacking you. I'm just not an idiot who genuinely believes in the good nature of your side. I'm calling you out for what you truly are.
I just find your game so sickening. You stack the deck hugely in your favor, censor everyone who hates you for it and then add onto that with constant mockery and dehumanization of anyone not willing to play.
You keep addressing arguments that I'm not making, claiming views that I don't hold, pretending I'm presenting a position that I'm not. I guess you're right, you're not attacking me.
Here's a hint for you: Win an argument by attacking the argument. Do not try and win it by attacking the person making the argument.
You're failing so badly that you're attacking a person you've devised in your head. You're not getting a defence against those attacks from me because they're nothing to do with me. You're holding an argument with your perceived bogeyman.
Maybe he'll come and respond.
Am I though? I think I'm just cutting through your fake attempt at sounding sane.
I already did. Women's groups banned recorded video as evidence a while ago. They made it legal to murder men in 2018. They pushed for misogyny law in 2019. (Now slated for 2021, because God forbid we say anything about our oppressors before they beat us to death.) Now this in 2020? You'd have to be a complete and utter moron to not see what's going on, or just a disinformation specialist trying to play off naivety. I'm voting that you're the latter.
I'd have to be a compete and utter moron to make a big issue about the self-evident "sexting is not consent" to the extent that it destroys my credibility and people stop listening to me regarding actual issues that do need to be addressed.
The broader context also includes a massive drop in rape prosecutions and demands that rape victims shouldn't have to provide their phones or social media details to police. If the guidance is "acquire that evidence but use it sensibly" then I consider that a massive improvement on the situation at the start of the year.
Nobody said it was - what I said was that it's better evidence than a woman's claims. This policy basically says your crocodile tears and wild fictional claims are worth more than saved, impossible to edit evidence.
Everything you do is to make our lives harder, it's pretty obvious by now.
The massive drop is because "victims" (It's accusers - calling them victims is yet another showing of your blindingly obvious pro-women bias.) were always full of shit and refused to provide basic information that should be required for their claims to even be heard, let alone prosecuted.
They should have to provide phones, social media and political affiliation. Any evidence of feminism - case dropped. Feminists are dirty, lying scum who use these things as a weapon.