It's as if the British political parties are in a contest to outdo each other in how horrible they can be.
This absolute moron and imbecile may have dethroned Steve Baker from the position of 'dumbest man in England'. Note that he is justifying the prosecution of a guy who is a pretty nasty kneeler himself. He interviewed Professor David Starkey, who pointed out that slavery is not genocide. For this crime against the racial myths of the radical left, he was destroyed. The boy Grimes, instead of protesting against this, now says that he should have 'challenged' Starkey more. No matter. This cretin will still justify you being persecuted for interviewing someone who made statements offensive to his racial cult.
Fucking moron. If you are not free to offend, then you don't have freedom of speech. Labour is never going to be a respectable party again if they don't purge the idiots, woke, anti-white, champagne socialist and Marxist scum from their ranks.
I suspect it might be easier to wipe the entire party and start from scratch.
Yes it absolutely means that. Freedom of speech, includes the freedom and right to say what the fuck you want.
Even the left acknowledge this when they chirp. In "freedom of speech not freedom from repercussions" which is a correct statement but they apply it falsely to situations where law doesn't back it up or as we have all seen change what is definition of hatespeech to apply repercussions.
He talks just like every other totalitarian regime or group ("freedom of speech doesn't mean we can offend this, or freedom of speech doesn't mean we can offend that" ) and we have to remind him the same thing we remind them it seems . Freedom of speech LITERALLY means the right to offend ANYTHING and ANYONE. If you cannot offend then you no longer have freedom of speech.
It's as if the British political parties are in a contest to outdo each other in how horrible they can be.
This absolute moron and imbecile may have dethroned Steve Baker from the position of 'dumbest man in England'. Note that he is justifying the prosecution of a guy who is a pretty nasty kneeler himself. He interviewed Professor David Starkey, who pointed out that slavery is not genocide. For this crime against the racial myths of the radical left, he was destroyed. The boy Grimes, instead of protesting against this, now says that he should have 'challenged' Starkey more. No matter. This cretin will still justify you being persecuted for interviewing someone who made statements offensive to his racial cult.
Archives for this post:
link - archive.org - archive.today
Fucking moron. If you are not free to offend, then you don't have freedom of speech. Labour is never going to be a respectable party again if they don't purge the idiots, woke, anti-white, champagne socialist and Marxist scum from their ranks.
I suspect it might be easier to wipe the entire party and start from scratch.
Everything labouf MPs say offends me should thrh be censored.
Muslim religion offends me, should thag bd banned?
This is the readin why we will nevef break the two party system. Theh are both complicit in making debate illegal.
Are you having a stroke? Your comments are usually more coherent.
I always heard it's only offensive speech that needs protecting.
Yes it absolutely means that. Freedom of speech, includes the freedom and right to say what the fuck you want.
Even the left acknowledge this when they chirp. In "freedom of speech not freedom from repercussions" which is a correct statement but they apply it falsely to situations where law doesn't back it up or as we have all seen change what is definition of hatespeech to apply repercussions.
He talks just like every other totalitarian regime or group ("freedom of speech doesn't mean we can offend this, or freedom of speech doesn't mean we can offend that" ) and we have to remind him the same thing we remind them it seems . Freedom of speech LITERALLY means the right to offend ANYTHING and ANYONE. If you cannot offend then you no longer have freedom of speech.
actually, it does.
TW.win censors all usage of "nigger". Who's fighting censorship? Which censorship are we fighting, again?
It's got nothing to do with us. They probably want to avoid glowies coming in and pretending that it's Trump supporters who are the real racists.