It has nothing to do with that. I really wish the retards on this sub would put on their thinking pants once in a while. The Justice to replace RBG was always going to be a women since RBG herself was a woman. Just like the justice to replace Thomas is guaranteed to be black.
You may not like it, but that's how picks are handled for SCOTUS. Its been this way since at least Thurgood Marshall, and is not going to change any time soon. Before you spill your tendies all over the floor, at least look at her record. She's easily the most strict textualist Justice from among Trump's shortlist. She even puts Scalia to shame.
Which assertion did you take offense with, the "own the libs" part? Because the rest of your post agrees that only candidates of a matching gender and race are allowed. It's the democrats who have created this unwritten law - why should anyone still play by their rules? They've proven time and time again that they will backpedal, lie and generally do whatever it takes to achieve their goals.
. The Justice to replace RBG was always going to be a women since RBG herself was a woman.
This right here should be absolutely frightening. It means that a man can be replaced by a woman, but never a woman be replaced by a man. RGB will get her wish of an all female SCOTUS, and it won't even be liberals that do it. Republicans HAVE to stop appeasing the center and left.
More like: when the democrats have established a method to successfully postpone a SC nomination for all male nominees, so your options are narrowed to ~50% of the population.
When you make a decision that will change the course of american justice for the next several decades based on genitals to own the libs
It has nothing to do with that. I really wish the retards on this sub would put on their thinking pants once in a while. The Justice to replace RBG was always going to be a women since RBG herself was a woman. Just like the justice to replace Thomas is guaranteed to be black.
You may not like it, but that's how picks are handled for SCOTUS. Its been this way since at least Thurgood Marshall, and is not going to change any time soon. Before you spill your tendies all over the floor, at least look at her record. She's easily the most strict textualist Justice from among Trump's shortlist. She even puts Scalia to shame.
Which assertion did you take offense with, the "own the libs" part? Because the rest of your post agrees that only candidates of a matching gender and race are allowed. It's the democrats who have created this unwritten law - why should anyone still play by their rules? They've proven time and time again that they will backpedal, lie and generally do whatever it takes to achieve their goals.
This right here should be absolutely frightening. It means that a man can be replaced by a woman, but never a woman be replaced by a man. RGB will get her wish of an all female SCOTUS, and it won't even be liberals that do it. Republicans HAVE to stop appeasing the center and left.
More like: when the democrats have established a method to successfully postpone a SC nomination for all male nominees, so your options are narrowed to ~50% of the population.