They will pay our social security
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
I always hated the "muh food" argument
import hundreds of thousands if not millions of culturally incompatible people, heighten social tension, increase violent crimes and rapes, unravel the very fabric of society, destroy your own culture and history
OR
get a fucking cookbook
Sometimes the recipe for their cuisine includes a girl they murdered. Yum!
Woman stonk. Woman dont need to cook.
They convinced the public that being the household cook/cooking for others was somehow demeaning. Of course, the merchant class likes this mentality, look at those fucking ads for Skip the Dishes (great service, but I really hate whoever that guy in the commercials is), especially that one that suggests one doesn't need kitchen utensils any more, because why cook for yourself? The economy NEEDS you to be lazy and get other people to do the simplest things for you.
The thing is, no one wants to be the one to do those simple things, because it's "not enough money" and, more importantly, not enough prestige. Because, you know, it's lowly to be a "servant". And eventually you get a society that functions pretty much like that feminist picnic that was in the news a few years back - they all wind up empty-handed, because they each assumed someone else would make the sandwiches. I guess it's better for human dignity to starve than to make "sammiches". At least, until some new slaver genetically engineers up some of Clark's simps.
And all of this is pushed by the so-called "environmentally conscious". Because nothing says "environmentally conscious" like a bunch of disposable take-out containers and plasticware.
Service economy promotion
Cooking is not that hard, at least the average ethnic food most people eat at a restaurant is easy enough to do.
Cookbooks don't produce authentic food, I heard.