They will pay our social security
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Your horses aren’t having enough babies! Their population is in decline! Quick, import a bunch of rats into your stable!
A better comparison would be between horses and zebras I think. They at least both equines, but zebras are far more aggressive and can not be used as horses.
That's because they're truly wild. There's no such thing as a truly wild horse any more, unless you're talking about Przewalski's Horse. Those ones running around free? Those aren't "wild", they're "feral". If they were plants, they'd be called a "landrace". They're domesticated horses that went back to living independently of Man.
Anyway, the jackasses who say that stuff about zebras are 1) trying to apologize for the failure of some human populations to domesticate much of anything and 2) somehow think that domestication starts with adults, and happens in one generation. (It probably started with a combination of following and trying to control the herds they preyed upon, and keeping the young of any adults they killed and ate for to grow them and eat them when they got bigger. It takes just minimal foresight, not much different than "say, if we plant seeds here today, there will be something to eat when we camp here next year." Or rather, noticing that the place where you threw your peach pits is now growing peach trees, and thinking maybe you could do it on purpose with other plants.) It does, however, take effort, long-term planning, and consistency to domesticate anything, as it takes about 40-50 generations of careful selection to get something that looks to humans for its social and physical needs (see: Russian pet fox experiment). You just keep and breed the ones that are easiest to handle.
ANYTHING can be domesticated if you start with youngsters, and practice proper eugenics.
Anything that is that big and relatively edible got either domesticated or went the way of the wooly mammoth
It’s from a comic I read one time, might have been Stonetoss.
I'm told tacos make invasions worth it. Do they bring something like tacos too?
I always hated the "muh food" argument
import hundreds of thousands if not millions of culturally incompatible people, heighten social tension, increase violent crimes and rapes, unravel the very fabric of society, destroy your own culture and history
OR
get a fucking cookbook
Sometimes the recipe for their cuisine includes a girl they murdered. Yum!
Woman stonk. Woman dont need to cook.
They convinced the public that being the household cook/cooking for others was somehow demeaning. Of course, the merchant class likes this mentality, look at those fucking ads for Skip the Dishes (great service, but I really hate whoever that guy in the commercials is), especially that one that suggests one doesn't need kitchen utensils any more, because why cook for yourself? The economy NEEDS you to be lazy and get other people to do the simplest things for you.
The thing is, no one wants to be the one to do those simple things, because it's "not enough money" and, more importantly, not enough prestige. Because, you know, it's lowly to be a "servant". And eventually you get a society that functions pretty much like that feminist picnic that was in the news a few years back - they all wind up empty-handed, because they each assumed someone else would make the sandwiches. I guess it's better for human dignity to starve than to make "sammiches". At least, until some new slaver genetically engineers up some of Clark's simps.
And all of this is pushed by the so-called "environmentally conscious". Because nothing says "environmentally conscious" like a bunch of disposable take-out containers and plasticware.
Service economy promotion
Cooking is not that hard, at least the average ethnic food most people eat at a restaurant is easy enough to do.
Cookbooks don't produce authentic food, I heard.
Yup, Kebabs. Really, really not worth it though.
Greeks would have been enough, there was no need to sample the whole ottoman territory to get decent kebabs.
Greeks aren't exotic enough in looks or culture, so their food is great (probably better than anything SJWs think "it's worth it" tbh) but they are still European so it doesn't count as "diversity".
Okay... take the Lebanese then? Great people, awesome food, historically recent experience in multiculturalism. What's not to like?
That's what I thought too, I mean, Latin America received many Levantine Arabs and they integrated just fine (They were also mostly Christian IIRC, but even the muslim ones are probably quite secular)
whenever they want to justify immigration its always curries they mention, as if that makes up for all the other shit
I like gringo tacos anyways. Not a single authentic mexican ingredient is harmed in the making.
As sad as it is true. I'd much rather have my country be like Japan than what it is right now.
Yeah, when they kept "reee-ing" about "aging population", they forgot to mention that all those pensioners would be gone after a while, leaving behind a lot of wealth, and would have left a lot of room and empty housing, too.
They conveniently renamed Baby Busters to Gen X just to hide the fact that the Baby Boom was an anomaly, not the norm they wanted.
Tenpenny Tower warned you.
Needs more vans, knifes and explosions.
Moving to japan so that I can be Cyborg Grandpa by 2050.