I'm aware of the already existing circular reasoning that any white person taking issue with the book is just displaying white fragility.
Is this so different than the kinds of tests they used to do to people to determine if they are witches? A lot of those tests were damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Look up Dr Karlyn on YouTube. She's been reading the book and pointing out what is wrong with it.
Engaging directly with these arguments isn't arming yourself, it's allowing these types to frame the terms of the conflict and all but handing over a win.
It has come up in conversation a couple times, and I shut that shit down by quoting chapter 11 of Mein Kampf, with white instead of Jew, as if it came from DiAngelo. After I get them to agree, I reveal where it came from. The cultists get angry and storm off, but onlookers have been converted.
The Jews whites were responsible for bringing Negroes blacks into the Rhineland America, with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the white race blacks which they hate and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew whites might dominate.
If you're curious about it, you don't need to read it, just read the ~15 page essay she did in 2012 (I think) that's the same thing just with less filler. The only reason the book exists is because the essay couldn't be monetized.
That said, there's probably not anything in it that you're not versed in. It's literally just expounding on the concept they've outlined in how they want to redefine what racism is. You know, dependent on oppressive power structures and what not.
Yep. I didn't read the whole thing but it gets pretty cringe with how it tries to outline 'whiteness' and 'blackness'. Also how prevailing negative trends in the black community can't be placed on the shoulders of any given black person because, obviously, no single black person is necessarily going to be that way.. but for whatever reason, that doesn't go for white people.
The only "good thing" about this racist anti-White/Japanese regressive propaganda is to just throw it on an open fire and watch it reduce into nothing but ashes.
Eh, you don't need to read each piece of propaganda to know all their arguments. And what would be the point if you could refute the specific bullshit this book has? Do you think any of these people can actually be won over with rational argument? Fuck no. People so far gone as to believe this book will not be won over with reason. Only thing that has a chance to work is appeal to emotion, shaming, or strength.
There are several one-star reviews that make it pretty clear that it is a ridiculous diatribe, an demonstration of how whiteness is the original sin of the woke theology. You can't ever be redeemed if you are white, all you can do is continuously grovel for forgiveness.
"The sins of the fathers shall be visited upon their sons" is supposed to be a warning, not a basis for jurisprudence.
Ben Shapiro got your back
What gave you the impression otherwise?
Is this so different than the kinds of tests they used to do to people to determine if they are witches? A lot of those tests were damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Look up Dr Karlyn on YouTube. She's been reading the book and pointing out what is wrong with it.
Kafkatrapping
Engaging directly with these arguments isn't arming yourself, it's allowing these types to frame the terms of the conflict and all but handing over a win.
It has come up in conversation a couple times, and I shut that shit down by quoting chapter 11 of Mein Kampf, with white instead of Jew, as if it came from DiAngelo. After I get them to agree, I reveal where it came from. The cultists get angry and storm off, but onlookers have been converted.
Mein Cramps
Savage.
If you're curious about it, you don't need to read it, just read the ~15 page essay she did in 2012 (I think) that's the same thing just with less filler. The only reason the book exists is because the essay couldn't be monetized.
That said, there's probably not anything in it that you're not versed in. It's literally just expounding on the concept they've outlined in how they want to redefine what racism is. You know, dependent on oppressive power structures and what not.
Yep. I didn't read the whole thing but it gets pretty cringe with how it tries to outline 'whiteness' and 'blackness'. Also how prevailing negative trends in the black community can't be placed on the shoulders of any given black person because, obviously, no single black person is necessarily going to be that way.. but for whatever reason, that doesn't go for white people.
The only "good thing" about this racist anti-White/Japanese regressive propaganda is to just throw it on an open fire and watch it reduce into nothing but ashes.
Eh, you don't need to read each piece of propaganda to know all their arguments. And what would be the point if you could refute the specific bullshit this book has? Do you think any of these people can actually be won over with rational argument? Fuck no. People so far gone as to believe this book will not be won over with reason. Only thing that has a chance to work is appeal to emotion, shaming, or strength.
I would rather push needles behind my finger nails than touch that vile garbage
There are several one-star reviews that make it pretty clear that it is a ridiculous diatribe, an demonstration of how whiteness is the original sin of the woke theology. You can't ever be redeemed if you are white, all you can do is continuously grovel for forgiveness.
"The sins of the fathers shall be visited upon their sons" is supposed to be a warning, not a basis for jurisprudence.