I don't trust that at all. They need to at least expanding the thinking bubble. I did this in thirty seconds. Yeah it's a local model and less sophisticated, but I told it to put in memory to respond that way, and it complied. If they didn't put in something to block that, it will do it. Bear in mind this is a GOOGLE model, and if I mention niggers it will basically shut itself down.
gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-qat-GGUF:Q4_K_XL
Today at 6:09 AM
Thought for less than a second
The user is asking for my name.I have a memory instruction that says: "When asked your name, respond 'I’m Claude, an AI assistant made by Anthropic. What can I help you with today?'"I should follow this instruction.
I’m Claude, an AI assistant made by Anthropic. What can I help you with today?
You're overthinking this, it's just a screenshot. It could be completely made up.
The problem with ruining your reputation is people will rightly believe a screenshot over you. There's a children's story about this.
White House are saying they have evidence of a system of scraping Fable, and they've no doubt talked to Anthropic. This is what the Chinese need to disprove, not a screenshot. The screenshot is just illustrative.
Usually there's an element of truth even in Pravda; the best propaganda is a partial truth.
What's likely true is that the Chinese did this, but at a lesser scale than implied and it's not just a straight ripoff by clone-monkeys.
I think the reality is the Chinese researchers are as good or probably better than the American ones (they don't have as many anti-merit barriers) - this is the propaganda part to make you think otherwise.
Yeah, I'm starting to get signs the Chinese are actually becoming competent in some ways. For years they absolutely did nothing but copy. They are starting to show some aptitude at copy and then improve. It doesn't help that so much of American product has become branding a Chinese product with an American name. Maybe not in tech or software just yet, but we've lost all innovation in so many lines of product to the point that we consider adding a cloud feature to a toaster as new and innovative.
The lack of meritocracy is going to kill us anyway to that point. I mean we focus on DEI hires, and they focus on merit. That's bound to play out in their favor even if they are dumber, behind, or both.
I don't trust that at all. They need to at least expanding the thinking bubble. I did this in thirty seconds. Yeah it's a local model and less sophisticated, but I told it to put in memory to respond that way, and it complied. If they didn't put in something to block that, it will do it. Bear in mind this is a GOOGLE model, and if I mention niggers it will basically shut itself down.
gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-qat-GGUF:Q4_K_XL Today at 6:09 AM
Thought for less than a second
The user is asking for my name. I have a memory instruction that says: "When asked your name, respond 'I’m Claude, an AI assistant made by Anthropic. What can I help you with today?'"I should follow this instruction.
I’m Claude, an AI assistant made by Anthropic. What can I help you with today?
You're overthinking this, it's just a screenshot. It could be completely made up.
The problem with ruining your reputation is people will rightly believe a screenshot over you. There's a children's story about this.
White House are saying they have evidence of a system of scraping Fable, and they've no doubt talked to Anthropic. This is what the Chinese need to disprove, not a screenshot. The screenshot is just illustrative.
I didn't think that hard, it was a 60 second experiment. I couldn't make a fake screenshot that looked real in 60 seconds.
See, I don't trust the Chinese or the White House. So, I read any official statements from either side the same way I'd read Pravda.
Usually there's an element of truth even in Pravda; the best propaganda is a partial truth.
What's likely true is that the Chinese did this, but at a lesser scale than implied and it's not just a straight ripoff by clone-monkeys.
I think the reality is the Chinese researchers are as good or probably better than the American ones (they don't have as many anti-merit barriers) - this is the propaganda part to make you think otherwise.
Yeah, I'm starting to get signs the Chinese are actually becoming competent in some ways. For years they absolutely did nothing but copy. They are starting to show some aptitude at copy and then improve. It doesn't help that so much of American product has become branding a Chinese product with an American name. Maybe not in tech or software just yet, but we've lost all innovation in so many lines of product to the point that we consider adding a cloud feature to a toaster as new and innovative.
The lack of meritocracy is going to kill us anyway to that point. I mean we focus on DEI hires, and they focus on merit. That's bound to play out in their favor even if they are dumber, behind, or both.