Charlie Kirk was killed by a radicalized queer who was supported by a tranny terror cell including his gay furry boyfriend. The queer used a stolen .30-06 rifle and shot him in the neck. Israel had absolutely nothing to do with it and you're a completely brain dead retard if you fell for the Candace Owens scam at any point after it happened.
*. Conspiracy defense (the FBI framing an innocent argument).
The problem is that her conspiracy argument is too weak to cover the physical evidence.
Suppose the FBI is persecuting the suspect. For the FBI to "frame" someone, they must plant evidence. If the FBI planted the DNA on the roof and the cloth, discarded graffiti cartridges, etc., then the FBI went to a great deal of trouble to simulate a crime scene, why then would they overlook the actual weapon (which the woman admits belongs to the suspect)?
If the FBI were going through the effort of framing a case, they would have planted the DNA on a weapon that matched the ballistic profile on the victim, making their case airtight.
she repeats the same mistake over and over.
full details:
The woman claims the video of the assassin running away shows no weapon, but the weapon was found in a woodland wrapped in a black cloth, and the video shows the assassin escaping carrying with him a rifle in a black cloth the video is just very shitty. In addition, the assassin holds the black cloth while jumping from the roof instead of throwing it away and picking it up later, which is a strange behavior complicating a dangerous jump. Furthermore, the black cloth holds a rigid shape that sags only after the middle; clothes sagging that way can only be explained in two ways: the cloth was wrapping something, or the cloth was a very rigid kind of fabric that partially holds its shape when sewn into an indument. Nobody believed the guy was carrying a winter black jacket in summer
The woman takes a snippet from the defense's report but speaks of it like it is a definitive and impartial report
The woman dismisses the DNA of the suspected assassin found on the weapon with the following arguments:
*. Your weapon normally has your DNA on it,
and
*. If she claims the FBI is persecuting the suspect, then it automatically does not matter.
The woman's dismissal of the DNA in this way crushes her thesis because:
DNA was found on the roof and on the cloth wrapping the weapon.
She is arguing that the FBI is trying to frame someone and is capable of planting DNA on the crime scene, but at the same time, the FBI overlooked the weapon, instead of also planting DNA on a suitable weapon.
The woman claims that there is no evidence that the shot was fired on the specific roof the assassin was recorded running away from, despite being the most logical position. She states that multiple eyewitnesses claim differently, but the example we got show is and old, uncertain woman.
Surveillance video gap. This is a good argument, but in the press conference, after the shooting, it was said that it was a portion of the video. I suspect it is just minutes of the suspect lying flat.
The woman performs a red herring. The culprit was found this way: the parent recognized him in the photos released by the FBI, talked with him, grew suspicious, or found out he was the shooter, called a detective who was their friend, and that guy called the sheriff.
The woman claims that the messages left that incriminate the suspect must have been planted by the FBI because they sound too strange or convenient. Because, again, this woman is arguing technical defense and conspiracy defense at the same time, her argument falls apart quite soon because obscure references to video games were found on the cartridges. Either the FBI has internet-savvy experts making meme references and therefore must also be able to write believable incriminating posts, or the FBI is too inept, and the cartridge source must be the suspect only.
Various conspiracy theories yadda yadda
Woman tries to profile the suspect, and doing so exposes her lack of expertise in assessing tranny, leftie, or even just midwits. Also, fuck that layer speech priming.
Yes, Kirk was getting critical of israel behavior is on stream, but sources told me that Kirk inside the oval office said... lmao
closure. The woman is arguing that the suspect cannot be the killer because the timing of the killing would have been convenient for someone else with an interest (israel), while the life prospects of the suspect were good, and it would be too hard to believe he would be willing to do the killing. This argument would get you raped in the courtroom. Ask AI why.
Then there's the fake and gay attempts. Butler, Penn was a staged WWE style shit show, along with all of his other BS "A" attempts, all 6 million of them. Change my mind.
In the old school WWF when you wanted a lot of blood in a match you would conceal a razor blade in your costume somewhere. Ideally in your headband even.
Then after you just "took a bunch of vicious punches to the face" you'd discreetly use the razor and cut your face up a bit.
The weird thing about Butler is the incompetence on both sides. Complicating the possibility above is the fact that in the haste to leave the site they left behind Trump's personal doctor and instead had to use whatever ER doctor was available when they finally did get to a hospital.
Who the fuck even knows? What is clear is that the government, because they're the only ones who could, immediately moved to cover everything about Crooks up and start the standard lies. "Was a loner. Strange kid. No online persona." All total bullshit.
In any case, the real thing to remember about Butler, is that more people than just Trump were shot, and Crooks somehow even managed to clip a hydraulic line on a telehandler.
So the only response is a thorough investigation and everyone responsible should be fired and possibly brought up on charges until we can find a rat who will open up the whole conspiracy. Requires competent law enforcement. The FBI and SS should be fully disbanded in the wake of Butler.
I'll say this as someone unfortunately quite familiar with the federal government, that's not even the worst incompetence I've ever seen. We're lucky swathes of the nation aren't on fire all the time.
The feds operate on an information blackout and the illusion of competence.
so true. i've worked in govt. govt employees fall into 2 classes: 1) the absolute bottom of the barrel, lowest of the low, lower dregs of society, scum of the earth--people who can't hold down a job in the private sector. And this includes, cops, firefighters, and teachers.
psychopaths
most of the leadership in government are unelected bureaucrats who have basically filled space for 30 years and scum rises to the top. the rest of them are there because of their connections.
I know of a scif that once had no crypto hand receipt holder for four years, completely because nobody bothered to double check.
They were still getting regular deliveries, material, documents, tape, etc.
The sheboon in charge of the site, when asked why she never brought this up or asked for a new receipt holder, simply said she didn't know what that was. 20 year career civvie. Not one functioning brain cell. She was not fired or disciplined.
the sheboons are granted special elite status in the government. they can't be held accountable for anything. the government is a jobs program for niggers. thats why so many of them work there. in my department they had a straightup fastrack program for quasi-legal South Africans and Nigerians. the secret is they intentionally paid well below market value and then claimed it was impossible to hire people to they were taking in boatloads of nigerians, somalians, ethiopians, and south apefricans. taxpayers were funding this without knowing. they were so dangerously negligent it was like a movie, i didn't believe what was happening was real, but it was.
It may be British but I recommend everyone watch the show Yes, Minister. It's all about a politician who's been elected to lead the country and the bureaucrats that actually do, and actually does a good job of showing how even a well meaning politician ultimately becomes part of the very deep state they were elected to fight.
So Crooks wasn't a loner he was a secret agent, but he was a retard who was filmed on the day by bystanders way in advance, but that was part of his secret agent training, but his secret agent training didn't involve marksmanship to clip him in the ear, that part was fake, but he shot close enough to have the bullet photographed in flight but trump had a razor to cut his ear just in case, trump is actually a trained circus performer and skilled in slight of hand and knew he wouldn't be photographed from an angle that would reveal this. The whole thing was fake except for the real people who got killed, including Crooks who gave his life for israel or the trump marketing team or something
Ah yes, the 'just asking questions' gambit. We can never know anything for certain, therefore crazy shit that you make up is just as valid as sensible evidence based conclusions. Truth doesn't exist, am I right?
Think about that for like 10 seconds.
I'm guessing you're implying that photographing a bullet in flight is fake, therefore adding another co-conspirator to this ever expanding web. Well probably 2 because they guy would have to take the photo, then send it to someone else to photoshop it real quick.
He had 8 people jump on him immediately afterwards.
Ok did they have dress rehearsals for that? Was trump involved in those or did he have a stand in? You'd have to observe it from all angles to make sure the gag worked. Was there a director? A studio audience? A couple of the secret service officers were physically incompetent obese dykes. Were they involved or did the key players just work around their bumbling?
you can't grasp chains of thought
Oh no, keep reading the sentence. Everything is fake EXCEPT for all the parts that are real which you change at will by just asking questions. Flowing through the cracks and adding more co-conspirators and increasingly improbably stunts.
Where there's smoke, there's fire.
Where there's [redacted], there's [account suspended]
He literally said before he was shot he thought they'd try.
Charlie Kirk was killed by a radicalized queer who was supported by a tranny terror cell including his gay furry boyfriend. The queer used a stolen .30-06 rifle and shot him in the neck. Israel had absolutely nothing to do with it and you're a completely brain dead retard if you fell for the Candace Owens scam at any point after it happened.
DID YOU WATCH THE VIDEO?
I watched the video, here is my critique for those who are interested.
TLDR:
The woman is attempting to use two different types of defense simultaneously:
*. Technical defense (ballistic argument, messages argument)
and
*. Conspiracy defense (the FBI framing an innocent argument).
The problem is that her conspiracy argument is too weak to cover the physical evidence. Suppose the FBI is persecuting the suspect. For the FBI to "frame" someone, they must plant evidence. If the FBI planted the DNA on the roof and the cloth, discarded graffiti cartridges, etc., then the FBI went to a great deal of trouble to simulate a crime scene, why then would they overlook the actual weapon (which the woman admits belongs to the suspect)? If the FBI were going through the effort of framing a case, they would have planted the DNA on a weapon that matched the ballistic profile on the victim, making their case airtight. she repeats the same mistake over and over.
full details:
*. Your weapon normally has your DNA on it,
and
*. If she claims the FBI is persecuting the suspect, then it automatically does not matter.
The woman's dismissal of the DNA in this way crushes her thesis because:
DNA was found on the roof and on the cloth wrapping the weapon.
She is arguing that the FBI is trying to frame someone and is capable of planting DNA on the crime scene, but at the same time, the FBI overlooked the weapon, instead of also planting DNA on a suitable weapon.
Fuck you.
lol
Youre being too conclusive imo
Try harder next time JIDF
goy goy goy
https://www.thefp.com/p/im-an-orthodox-jew-because-of-charlie-kirk
Then there's the fake and gay attempts. Butler, Penn was a staged WWE style shit show, along with all of his other BS "A" attempts, all 6 million of them. Change my mind.
No human alive can deliberately graze only someone's ear with a rifle at that distance.
In the old school WWF when you wanted a lot of blood in a match you would conceal a razor blade in your costume somewhere. Ideally in your headband even.
Then after you just "took a bunch of vicious punches to the face" you'd discreetly use the razor and cut your face up a bit.
The weird thing about Butler is the incompetence on both sides. Complicating the possibility above is the fact that in the haste to leave the site they left behind Trump's personal doctor and instead had to use whatever ER doctor was available when they finally did get to a hospital.
Who the fuck even knows? What is clear is that the government, because they're the only ones who could, immediately moved to cover everything about Crooks up and start the standard lies. "Was a loner. Strange kid. No online persona." All total bullshit.
In any case, the real thing to remember about Butler, is that more people than just Trump were shot, and Crooks somehow even managed to clip a hydraulic line on a telehandler.
So the only response is a thorough investigation and everyone responsible should be fired and possibly brought up on charges until we can find a rat who will open up the whole conspiracy. Requires competent law enforcement. The FBI and SS should be fully disbanded in the wake of Butler.
I'll say this as someone unfortunately quite familiar with the federal government, that's not even the worst incompetence I've ever seen. We're lucky swathes of the nation aren't on fire all the time.
The feds operate on an information blackout and the illusion of competence.
so true. i've worked in govt. govt employees fall into 2 classes: 1) the absolute bottom of the barrel, lowest of the low, lower dregs of society, scum of the earth--people who can't hold down a job in the private sector. And this includes, cops, firefighters, and teachers.
most of the leadership in government are unelected bureaucrats who have basically filled space for 30 years and scum rises to the top. the rest of them are there because of their connections.
I know of a scif that once had no crypto hand receipt holder for four years, completely because nobody bothered to double check.
They were still getting regular deliveries, material, documents, tape, etc.
The sheboon in charge of the site, when asked why she never brought this up or asked for a new receipt holder, simply said she didn't know what that was. 20 year career civvie. Not one functioning brain cell. She was not fired or disciplined.
the sheboons are granted special elite status in the government. they can't be held accountable for anything. the government is a jobs program for niggers. thats why so many of them work there. in my department they had a straightup fastrack program for quasi-legal South Africans and Nigerians. the secret is they intentionally paid well below market value and then claimed it was impossible to hire people to they were taking in boatloads of nigerians, somalians, ethiopians, and south apefricans. taxpayers were funding this without knowing. they were so dangerously negligent it was like a movie, i didn't believe what was happening was real, but it was.
I read a book from a german in the 20s about exactly that though in his time they were called parliamentaries.
It may be British but I recommend everyone watch the show Yes, Minister. It's all about a politician who's been elected to lead the country and the bureaucrats that actually do, and actually does a good job of showing how even a well meaning politician ultimately becomes part of the very deep state they were elected to fight.
Are you actually fucking retarded?
I am
Ah yes, the 'just asking questions' gambit. We can never know anything for certain, therefore crazy shit that you make up is just as valid as sensible evidence based conclusions. Truth doesn't exist, am I right?
I'm guessing you're implying that photographing a bullet in flight is fake, therefore adding another co-conspirator to this ever expanding web. Well probably 2 because they guy would have to take the photo, then send it to someone else to photoshop it real quick.
Ok did they have dress rehearsals for that? Was trump involved in those or did he have a stand in? You'd have to observe it from all angles to make sure the gag worked. Was there a director? A studio audience? A couple of the secret service officers were physically incompetent obese dykes. Were they involved or did the key players just work around their bumbling?
Oh no, keep reading the sentence. Everything is fake EXCEPT for all the parts that are real which you change at will by just asking questions. Flowing through the cracks and adding more co-conspirators and increasingly improbably stunts.
Have you ever seen the sight picture of that shot using that gun and that sight? You can't even make out an ear, much less target it.
AK Guy/Brandon Herrera did a simulation of it using the same kit. There's a view of the shot just before the four minute mark.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsvJzfXZI18&t=237s
So Israel organised an assassination in days? how many days?
several
You act like they don't have playbooks and protocols for this sort of thing.