We'll never get rid of murderers. We shouldn't promote murder. Accurate.
I agree with reducing gays but I disagree with targeting gays specifically. Homosexual grooming should be illegal but there's other systemic changes we can make to get rid of gays aside from simply not promoting it. I don't think there's any coincidence that the rise in homosexuality coincided with feminism and the rise of hypergamy. If we reduced taxes by 90%, cut all social programs (along with ending alimony, ending child support and ending 50/50 division of assets) and thus made most women far more reliant on men generation resources for them then women would be more inclined to seduce men for their resources which would reduce the prevalence of gays. A lot of gays/bi guys I've met seem like they're just adapting to the lack of women by fucking men, almost like what they do in prison also. Increase the amount of hot women that need men in society and you reduce homosexuality.
I really don't want the government involved in this. Society can punish gays enough on their own without government involvement when the Civil Rights Act is abolished. The reason I don't want government involved is because these sorts of laws can be easily abused, exploited which leads to corruption. Your buddy comes over at 11pm and you guys play some mario kart, neighbor decides to rat you out to the gay police and they show video evidence at the apartment of guys coming over late at night to prove your gay. Turns into a bit of a witch hunt. Better to leave the government out of this and let society handle it. No need for laws to punish gays. We just need to get rid of the laws that punish non-gays for not including gays.
The last century serves as the example that there isn't a middle ground. They never wanted to be left alone and they never had any intent of leaving everyone else alone.
In the last decade we have lived through the lie of leaving them alone morph into them slaughtering children en masse and perverts advocating mutilation in preschools. And all it took was the repeal of the century old anti sodomy laws.
Any tolerance has been conclusively proven to be a fatal mistake, even the slightest amount. Active, deliberate formalized intolerance is the sole way to correct it.
Natural selection. Having our faggiest people castrate themselves isn't really a bad thing. Remember, you and everyone who cares about their child should be home-schooling. I actually have had 0 issue with gays or trans people whatsoever. I actually don't mind gays because every gay who takes themselves out of the dating pool improves my value on the dating market. If 50% of men were gay, I'd be better off. The real issue is that I should be allowed to not sell them products/services and my tax dollars shouldn't be going to support anything to do with them.
We'll never get rid of murderers. We shouldn't promote murder. Accurate.
I agree with reducing gays but I disagree with targeting gays specifically. Homosexual grooming should be illegal but there's other systemic changes we can make to get rid of gays aside from simply not promoting it. I don't think there's any coincidence that the rise in homosexuality coincided with feminism and the rise of hypergamy. If we reduced taxes by 90%, cut all social programs (along with ending alimony, ending child support and ending 50/50 division of assets) and thus made most women far more reliant on men generation resources for them then women would be more inclined to seduce men for their resources which would reduce the prevalence of gays. A lot of gays/bi guys I've met seem like they're just adapting to the lack of women by fucking men, almost like what they do in prison also. Increase the amount of hot women that need men in society and you reduce homosexuality.
Not shouldn't promote.
Actively punish, persecute, and discourage.
It is no coincidence that one of the very first things heralding the destruction of a nation is the abomination rearing its head.
I really don't want the government involved in this. Society can punish gays enough on their own without government involvement when the Civil Rights Act is abolished. The reason I don't want government involved is because these sorts of laws can be easily abused, exploited which leads to corruption. Your buddy comes over at 11pm and you guys play some mario kart, neighbor decides to rat you out to the gay police and they show video evidence at the apartment of guys coming over late at night to prove your gay. Turns into a bit of a witch hunt. Better to leave the government out of this and let society handle it. No need for laws to punish gays. We just need to get rid of the laws that punish non-gays for not including gays.
The last century serves as the example that there isn't a middle ground. They never wanted to be left alone and they never had any intent of leaving everyone else alone.
In the last decade we have lived through the lie of leaving them alone morph into them slaughtering children en masse and perverts advocating mutilation in preschools. And all it took was the repeal of the century old anti sodomy laws.
Any tolerance has been conclusively proven to be a fatal mistake, even the slightest amount. Active, deliberate formalized intolerance is the sole way to correct it.
Natural selection. Having our faggiest people castrate themselves isn't really a bad thing. Remember, you and everyone who cares about their child should be home-schooling. I actually have had 0 issue with gays or trans people whatsoever. I actually don't mind gays because every gay who takes themselves out of the dating pool improves my value on the dating market. If 50% of men were gay, I'd be better off. The real issue is that I should be allowed to not sell them products/services and my tax dollars shouldn't be going to support anything to do with them.
Keep dreaming and sperging buddy. If you want this you need to overthrow the existing government and that's a very tall order.
Correct but also to ban gays at this point, you'd need an equal amount of power.
Just require them to take a parasite cleans; solves 99% of the problem.
Haha, I've heard of this before.