It doesn't matter if you don't like what he has to say. This case has nothing to do with chud as a person. It has everything to do with whether it's okay for a feral nigger to viciously attack you because you said something it didn't like.
We're supposed to have freedom of speech in this country.
Yes it does matter. Nuisance streamers are scum, a nigger in Korea screaming "ching chong tiny peepee!" is the same as some white dude screaming "nigger nigger gonna chimpout?" in an American city. Both are clowns making fools of themselves for attention.
I don't know. The johnny Somali isn't from the countries he's antagonizing people in. He's a guest. I can only assume this Chud guy (never heard of him) is American. So right there we have different expectations. White guy is at home. He should expect certain privileges not afforded to guests.
And if words are enough to justify violence we don't have free speech. Because literally anyone could say "he used fighting words" and then attack you. This is justifying niggers chimping out with no self control.
I walked up to you, sticking my phone in your face, while calling you a faggot over and over I should expect you to break my nose. That used to be a hallmark of white society, where there were severe and immediate consequences for breaking decorum.
The way this impacts you is if you're in a similar situation, the troon prosecutor will point to a case like this and say "See? We've historically punished racists that shot feral niggers before, so now it should be no different." And that's how the jewed legal system works in this country.
So your personal opinions towards Chud are largely irrelevant. Stop thinking emotionally like a woman. Being against Chud right now is a losing strategy.
You're the one thinking like a woman insisting that I should blindly back 'our guy' despite the circumstances. Daniel Penny being prosecuted for choking out a nigger who was harassing people on the subway isn't the same as this guy being prosecuted for shooting a nigger he provoked first. There's legal precedent for this kind of thing, Tanner Cook pulled that "it's just a prank bro!" bullshit and got shot shot for it, and the jury acquitted the shooter. No race element involved. Chud is hurting our cause because him provoking niggers is taking attention away from niggers who attack whites unprovoked.
Normally I'd agree with you, but this guy is just a groyper Johnny Somali.
Ok and? If you haven't noticed, there is a war going on.
The war that won't be won being a retard for money while livestreaming. His behavior is no different than the average black ne'er do well
How does this help? I'm as racist as anyone here, and I think this guy is acting just as much of a nigger as those he provokes.
It doesn't matter if you don't like what he has to say. This case has nothing to do with chud as a person. It has everything to do with whether it's okay for a feral nigger to viciously attack you because you said something it didn't like.
We're supposed to have freedom of speech in this country.
Yes it does matter. Nuisance streamers are scum, a nigger in Korea screaming "ching chong tiny peepee!" is the same as some white dude screaming "nigger nigger gonna chimpout?" in an American city. Both are clowns making fools of themselves for attention.
I don't know. The johnny Somali isn't from the countries he's antagonizing people in. He's a guest. I can only assume this Chud guy (never heard of him) is American. So right there we have different expectations. White guy is at home. He should expect certain privileges not afforded to guests.
And if words are enough to justify violence we don't have free speech. Because literally anyone could say "he used fighting words" and then attack you. This is justifying niggers chimping out with no self control.
I walked up to you, sticking my phone in your face, while calling you a faggot over and over I should expect you to break my nose. That used to be a hallmark of white society, where there were severe and immediate consequences for breaking decorum.
No, it actually doesn't matter at all.
The way this impacts you is if you're in a similar situation, the troon prosecutor will point to a case like this and say "See? We've historically punished racists that shot feral niggers before, so now it should be no different." And that's how the jewed legal system works in this country.
So your personal opinions towards Chud are largely irrelevant. Stop thinking emotionally like a woman. Being against Chud right now is a losing strategy.
You're the one thinking like a woman insisting that I should blindly back 'our guy' despite the circumstances. Daniel Penny being prosecuted for choking out a nigger who was harassing people on the subway isn't the same as this guy being prosecuted for shooting a nigger he provoked first. There's legal precedent for this kind of thing, Tanner Cook pulled that "it's just a prank bro!" bullshit and got shot shot for it, and the jury acquitted the shooter. No race element involved. Chud is hurting our cause because him provoking niggers is taking attention away from niggers who attack whites unprovoked.
And people physically attacking them over it are still retards that apparently get what they deserve