Actually, not what I was saying since spending money to promote multiculturalism isn't really violent by most people's definition so I wouldn't be a violent asshole at all. I guess you missed that.
In any case, it's obvious you're jewish or an anti-White white with all your posting so I'm going to ignore you from here on out. I'm on this forum precisely so I don't have to argue with me enemies like on a reddit (where you belong).
Well, Reddit doesn't agree that I belong there. I'm very, very banned over there. I'm on their defcon-3 ban list, where they ban me for saying hello.
But dude, if you want a forum where everyone agrees with you, why not specifically seek out a white-supremacist forum, instead of one that promotes itself as free speech? This one seems to be arguing that everyone is free to speak; if you want to live the live of a violent asshole without dissent, why not just find a forum that strictly limits itself to like-minded violent assholes?
You're the violent asshole btw. I never once insulted you but you started the personal insults. That's "violence". So, I don't know why you're trying to slander me for being a "violent asshole" when you're acting like one.
Oh, you think my words are violence? Spoken like a true fourth-wave feminist.
Louise Arbour is dealing with a culture of disgrunted young white men who want to exterminate everyone who isn't them and who are being issued among the most lethal weapons in human history by the government. It's crazy dangerous. She wants to try to fix that by hiring a somewhat larger proportion of women and minorities.
And you're like "GET HER, SHE'S A DEMON."
So, yeah, that's why I call you a violent asshole.
Seriously, more Straw Manning? Okay, now it's obviously deliberate. What a terrible way to argue. Do better.
No one's against White people? They teach that we're oppressors in school, they give our jobs away to non-Whites who are less competent, they tax us and give our tax money to non-Whites who are less deserving. They bring in nons and create an environment that promotes children for nons while creating a hostile anti-child environment for Whites. Their advertisements show nons having sex with White women and then White couples committing suicide or choosing not to have kids to save the environment. Our leaders call White people who promote the interests of Whites to be radical evil Nazis that need to be rid of.
And you tell me no one is against Whites? It's clear to me that you are against Whites also so even if no one else was (many people are) you would be.
I'm not even getting into incompatible genetics of non-Whites that create a structurally anti-White society by their mere existence yet either, especially in a democracy or society that caters to their preferences.
This whole society is anti-White to its core but at least you've created a few more ZOG Bots to spin the hamster wheel around for another generation. Good on you.
If you add a bunch of 80 IQ people to a school of 100 IQ people, who benefits? The 80 IQs or the 100 IQ? Studies show there's a reversion to mean so intelligent students do worse being mixed with less intelligent people and less intelligent people do better being mixed with more intelligent people. This makes intuitive sense when you consider sports. Bad players mixed with good players stand to learn more to improve than good players mixed with bad players.
Now take the above and apply it to society as a whole.
Our society promotes anti-White policies at every level and then the White people react, appropriately, for the oppression they face and you call them violent extremists. The oppressors, our government and anti-White people, are the real problem not the White men reacting to the problem.
Actually, not what I was saying since spending money to promote multiculturalism isn't really violent by most people's definition so I wouldn't be a violent asshole at all. I guess you missed that.
In any case, it's obvious you're jewish or an anti-White white with all your posting so I'm going to ignore you from here on out. I'm on this forum precisely so I don't have to argue with me enemies like on a reddit (where you belong).
Well, Reddit doesn't agree that I belong there. I'm very, very banned over there. I'm on their defcon-3 ban list, where they ban me for saying hello.
But dude, if you want a forum where everyone agrees with you, why not specifically seek out a white-supremacist forum, instead of one that promotes itself as free speech? This one seems to be arguing that everyone is free to speak; if you want to live the live of a violent asshole without dissent, why not just find a forum that strictly limits itself to like-minded violent assholes?
You're the violent asshole btw. I never once insulted you but you started the personal insults. That's "violence". So, I don't know why you're trying to slander me for being a "violent asshole" when you're acting like one.
Oh, you think my words are violence? Spoken like a true fourth-wave feminist.
Louise Arbour is dealing with a culture of disgrunted young white men who want to exterminate everyone who isn't them and who are being issued among the most lethal weapons in human history by the government. It's crazy dangerous. She wants to try to fix that by hiring a somewhat larger proportion of women and minorities.
And you're like "GET HER, SHE'S A DEMON."
So, yeah, that's why I call you a violent asshole.
Seriously, more Straw Manning? Okay, now it's obviously deliberate. What a terrible way to argue. Do better.
No one's against White people? They teach that we're oppressors in school, they give our jobs away to non-Whites who are less competent, they tax us and give our tax money to non-Whites who are less deserving. They bring in nons and create an environment that promotes children for nons while creating a hostile anti-child environment for Whites. Their advertisements show nons having sex with White women and then White couples committing suicide or choosing not to have kids to save the environment. Our leaders call White people who promote the interests of Whites to be radical evil Nazis that need to be rid of.
And you tell me no one is against Whites? It's clear to me that you are against Whites also so even if no one else was (many people are) you would be.
I'm not even getting into incompatible genetics of non-Whites that create a structurally anti-White society by their mere existence yet either, especially in a democracy or society that caters to their preferences.
This whole society is anti-White to its core but at least you've created a few more ZOG Bots to spin the hamster wheel around for another generation. Good on you.
If you add a bunch of 80 IQ people to a school of 100 IQ people, who benefits? The 80 IQs or the 100 IQ? Studies show there's a reversion to mean so intelligent students do worse being mixed with less intelligent people and less intelligent people do better being mixed with more intelligent people. This makes intuitive sense when you consider sports. Bad players mixed with good players stand to learn more to improve than good players mixed with bad players.
Now take the above and apply it to society as a whole.
Our society promotes anti-White policies at every level and then the White people react, appropriately, for the oppression they face and you call them violent extremists. The oppressors, our government and anti-White people, are the real problem not the White men reacting to the problem.