That explains why they get along so damn well.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
... and why they're inherently INCOMPATABLE with Christian Western civilization.
Narratives of Power: The Parallels of Zionism and Hindutva
You just literally normalised the idea that certain groups are inherently 'other', justifying exclusion and violence.
They did that to themselves. Noticing their behavior isn't the same as endorsing it, idiot.
It is your behavior. You believe that certain groups are inherently 'other', justifying exclusion and violence. You are condemning the thing you practice every day.
Cool. Now STFU and "other" yourself.
You're actually stupid.
I'm not condemning it. I just think that if they do it, we should do it too. Ethics is a reciprocal system. You can only apply ethics to ethical people. You cannot apply ethics to unethical people.
Are you really this big of a dysgenic pussy?
It's an 11 day old account posting in bad faith, so either he's exactly that dysgenic or someone is trolling for giggles.
Either it's dysgenic or it's in bad faith. Make up your mind, idiot.
"Those guys really don't like us and think we're just resources to be exploited. I think we should probably protect ourselves from them."
You: "You're othering them to justify exclusion and violence!"
You're just embarrassing.
I think you're missing that OP accused Jews of normalising the idea that certain groups are inherently 'other', justifying exclusion and violence.
When you say "You're othering them to justify exclusion and violence," you aren't quoting me. You're quoting the academic paper "Narratives of Power: The Parallels of Zionism and Hindutva."
I found it amusing that OP would try to 'other' Jews by accusing them of 'othering.' It's like taking your dick out and then accusing the guy next to you of being a pervert.
Your analogy is painfully stupid.
Every viable moral framework depends upon the order of events. Self-defense isn't murder. Punishing anti-social behavior isn't anti-social. Pointing to the bad behavior of another tribe is not itself a bad behavior. And identifying a group of people after they have consistently and proudly identified themselves is not "othering" them.
Also, I reject the implied premise of "othering" as a valid concept. It is a laughably reductive term that is exclusively deployed as a strategic catch-all against behaviors that leftists deem to be wrong.
A better question would be, who normalized the idea that all groups are inherently 'identical'?
John Locke and Franz Boas, I guess. Locke argued that people were largely blank slates at birth and that a king is fundamentally no different from a peasant; Boas debunked "scientific racism" like phrenology.
Now I'm picturing you in the "read Locke" t-shirt with a spear through your chest lol
Now now, judging a king and a peasant from the same country isn't the same as judging two kings from different countries, is it?
they are
exclusion is good, it keeps things healthy and respectful. violence is necessary if the excluded don't accept that no means no.