This type of pompous, self-aggrandizing stupidity is actually quite common and widespread
It certainly is in this thread, in which you've typed out various walls of text focusing on semantics and technicalities that serve no purpose other than to stroke your own ego and waste time.
Some people are dumb (you may include me in this category if you wish). That doesn't deprive them of personhood.
It genuinely saddens me that you look at this minute expenditure of my time and effort and see it as some great artifice made purely for self-aggrandizement. It is not. I am legitimately trying to communicate, and this is how I normally do it.
I know most folks nowadays seem to think writing more than three or four sentences is some herculean effort worthy of song, but understand that this is not so.
Understand also that what you try to dismiss as semantics the the core of philosophy, and philosophy is the crux of what we are debating here.
It certainly is in this thread, in which you've typed out various walls of text focusing on semantics and technicalities that serve no purpose other than to stroke your own ego and waste time.
Some people are dumb (you may include me in this category if you wish). That doesn't deprive them of personhood.
It genuinely saddens me that you look at this minute expenditure of my time and effort and see it as some great artifice made purely for self-aggrandizement. It is not. I am legitimately trying to communicate, and this is how I normally do it.
I know most folks nowadays seem to think writing more than three or four sentences is some herculean effort worthy of song, but understand that this is not so.
Understand also that what you try to dismiss as semantics the the core of philosophy, and philosophy is the crux of what we are debating here.
You're an autistic faggot