For Trump alone, there have been 3 different incidents:
- Butler, Pennsylvania - 1 audience member killed, 2 others injured
- West Palm Beach, Florida - Traffic stop resulted in injuries to a 6-year old girl
- White House Correspondents Dinner
Charlie Kirk's killer was also not identified based on pre-trial facts regarding the weapon and force. There are also some who question the sincerity of his widow.
So, with that said, why did they stage the press dinner? Which, if any, of the other events were also false flags?
Based on what evidence?
The gun that, somehow, wasn't found by the bomb sniffing dogs, but was immediately found by some random dude once the FBI arrived on scene? The one that the prosecution refuses to give to the defense for examination?
The text messages to his "lover" in which he said he had intended to take the secret to the grave, but proceeded to spill his entire plan instead? The text messages that won't actually be presented in court, but instead pictures of the text messages that an agent took? The phone that the prosecution won't give to the defense for examination?
The fact that in said text messages, he claimed to want to go out on "his own terms" in what was clearly implied to be a shootout with the cops, but instead turned himself in?
The paper note that he wrote and left at his computer that was apparently destroyed but we have "evidence of it" that detailed his plan, despite his intention to take the secret to the grave?
The fact that they keep claiming that he turned himself in but can't produce video of him turning himself in, despite FOIA requests, because it was deleted?
The fact that many people keep claiming that he professed his guilt but for some reason, he seems to be fighting it out and paying for expensive attorneys? That his family doesn't seem to think he's guilty? (not in a "he dindu nuffin, he a good boy and it was Charlie Kirk's fault for bullying him!" way)
The fact that Erika Kirk immediately "forgave" him but also keeps fighting to have the case sped up as much as possible (invoking Utah state's victim's right to a speedy trial -- NOT the same thing as a defendant's right to a speedy trial) rather than simply let the justice system do its thing?
I've barely even scratched the surface of inconsistencies on this thing. To this day I have seen zero evidence that I find remotely convincing that Tyler Robinson is guilty of anything. A conveniently time-cropped video showing some dude running across a roof line and a couple of grainy photos that look vaguely similar to any number of lanky white guys. And a rifle -- inconsistent with the wound -- that miraculously appeared on scene nearby that was disassembled, assembled, fired, disassembled, and reassembled prior to being stashed and missed by bomb dogs. This isn't compelling evidence.
Some queer furry trans lover shooting Kirk is the easiest thing in the world to believe, so you'd need to have some really powerful evidence to put that into 'hard to believe' category.
Text messages: he thought he would get away with it, then when he sees himself on the camera he tries to keep his gay lover off the hook.
Fighting in court: other crazy libs are paying for it, the gov't won't let him off with a low-time plea deal because politics, so he rolls the dice at trial.
Erika: she's acting out good-Christian in forgiving him, and her and Turning Point seem to have a lot of secrets they want the spotlight off of.
So you lead with the obvious, easily explained ones?
Basically the government hasn't shown you their entire case and all the evidence, you say "why haven't they shown us the entire case? huh? conspiracy they're hiding things!"
News for you, that's what the trial is for. That's when you get to see the entire case made, not before the trial.