Lack of risk/ innovation is also female pattern behavior. There’s a reason that actual innovation of corporations died rapidly over the past 30 years in exchange for the current mess we have.
Women are experts at innovative talking and are hyper-aware of the status or how speaking sounds and how it is percieved by their peers or people of higher status.
They are the first to adopt new popular words and phrases, the first to abandon their native dialect for a more prestigious one, and the first to abandon their language for the dominant one. And rub it in the face of other women who have yet to do it to assert a higher social status over them.
This is also a form of risk-avoidance. ( Avoiding being excluded from higher society by speaking like ''the lessers''. )
Most young women are lapping-up all the woke newspeak with great enthousiasm.
When it's time to actually create tangible stuff? It's men doing most of that.
Women are experts at innovative talking and are hyper-aware of the status or how speaking sounds and how it is percieved by their peers or people of higher status.
Not really, women are input-output addicts, it’s why they cry the second they get caught doing anything, they know intense emotions get preferable outcomes for them. The average woman is not intelligent enough to understand anything other than “saying/ doing this gets me that” and act entirely based on that predisposition. Women are experts at manipulation, it’s the default setting for 80+% of women.
They're only "experts" because men get a -30 IQ debuff just being around them. Any rational observer would find women's attempts at manipulation stupid and puerile, but men want to put their penises inside women, so men tolerate it.
It's much more simple: You're being lorded over by people who never had your best interests at heart.
The purpose of a system is what it does, and what the system is doing should make the purpose very evident.
"We, The People" are not sovereign, but subjects, and you're never going to vote your way out of tyranny.
What did voting for a "renegade" like Trump ultimately accomplish? He circled all the way back to neocon policies. That didn't happen by accident, but by design.
What if “wokeness” and “over regulation” are just female patterns of behavior?
Instead of producing things themselves- it is far easier to nag/grab other crabs back into the bucket.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2045362463260971461
Lack of risk/ innovation is also female pattern behavior. There’s a reason that actual innovation of corporations died rapidly over the past 30 years in exchange for the current mess we have.
Women are experts at innovative talking and are hyper-aware of the status or how speaking sounds and how it is percieved by their peers or people of higher status.
They are the first to adopt new popular words and phrases, the first to abandon their native dialect for a more prestigious one, and the first to abandon their language for the dominant one. And rub it in the face of other women who have yet to do it to assert a higher social status over them.
This is also a form of risk-avoidance. ( Avoiding being excluded from higher society by speaking like ''the lessers''. )
Most young women are lapping-up all the woke newspeak with great enthousiasm.
When it's time to actually create tangible stuff? It's men doing most of that.
Not really, women are input-output addicts, it’s why they cry the second they get caught doing anything, they know intense emotions get preferable outcomes for them. The average woman is not intelligent enough to understand anything other than “saying/ doing this gets me that” and act entirely based on that predisposition. Women are experts at manipulation, it’s the default setting for 80+% of women.
They're only "experts" because men get a -30 IQ debuff just being around them. Any rational observer would find women's attempts at manipulation stupid and puerile, but men want to put their penises inside women, so men tolerate it.
It's much more simple: You're being lorded over by people who never had your best interests at heart.
The purpose of a system is what it does, and what the system is doing should make the purpose very evident.
"We, The People" are not sovereign, but subjects, and you're never going to vote your way out of tyranny.
What did voting for a "renegade" like Trump ultimately accomplish? He circled all the way back to neocon policies. That didn't happen by accident, but by design.