Why did you share a video that just kept repeating 'DO NOT REDEEM! DO NOT REDEEM!' ? /s
Anyway this is just a clusterfuck as there seems to be a BIG divide between the civilian government and the IRG and this action by the IRG is pissing off the last of it's supporters.
Edit: damn it this subject already posted here, 50/50 if I should remove as it's essentially the same information.
India is a two-faced, self-absorbed nation whose leader fork-tongued Bibi's anus and slobbered all over his cock immediately prior to hostilities being rained upon Iran. They conspicuously failed to condemn the attack.
Russia is steadfastly on Iran's side. China, despite their push for negotiations due to their economic interests is not abandoning the belt-and-road initiative, where Iran plays a massive role (and they supposedly may have provided the loitering drones that were pivotal immediately prior to the fake ceasefire). Oman remains relatively friendly given pragmatism and geographical proximity if not more.
Who are these "supporters" of interest that Iran has isolated, exactly?
It's certainly not India, who shamelessly crawled back for oil once the war started, and prior to that used to aggressively barter against their fellow BRICS member for lower prices due to U.S. sanctions while retaining an outstanding oil tab.
I don't know what happened in this incident, but there isn't much of a divide at all. Maybe there might have been one if U.S.-Israel had kept their side of the preconditions and weren't attempting to actively kill (yet again!) the delegation, or starting geopolitical stunts like the minesweeper -- perhaps as a show of strength or provocation to force the Iranians to quit diplomacy first for optics -- but they did. So it's not relevant. Example (there are similar direct statements from Qalibaf and others) - https://t.me/FotrosResistancee/21148
Essentially the Iranian foreign minister said it's open, then the IRGC said no it's not and in the response to this Indian crew, they actually refer to their own foreign minister as an idiot and that THEY are the ones that say if it open or not.
Yes, but they aren't wrong. Araghchi is much better than Pezeshkian and highly intelligent, but in attempting to appease the Chinese, Iran made arguably an optical blunder by knowingfully engaging in what are bad-faith negotiations by the opposition. In reality that's not really true since they never ceded any military gains.
All of Iran is on the side of the IGRC; even pro-Shah proponents are as well, having seen harmless schools and hospitals be arbitrarily bombed and hence awakened to reality. India will get over the minor kerfuffle -- unlike the Iranian ship that sank during a non-military expedition near India, this resulted in a literal nothing-burger besides slightly bruised egos.
The Iranian parliament is on the side of the IGRC as well. They were just trying to engage with diplomacy given geopolitical realities; they aren't stupid, they are well aware of Israeli (and American) duplicitous tactics and were doing China a favor.
If you read the series of commentary from Qalibaf, it's fully acknowledging and rebuking the opposite side's tactics. My point is that you're wrong when you say that Iran is isolating anyone -- they're not. In fact, it's the opposite for the Axis of Resistance (e.g. Hezbollah, Ansar Allash) since Iran acknowledges Hezbollah's role and are insistent on not abandoning Lebanon, and the non-Resistance either has incentive to go against the petro-dollar and/or is not ignorant of Iran's history, where they have been exceedingly, irrationally tolerant of the opposition's attacks.
In summary: fuck India. They may or may not have been wronged in this incident, but unlike China, who has relations with both Iran & Israel but is able to straddle diplomacy without burying BRICS, the same cannot be said for India, which engages in a far more parasitic relationship.
The president and foreign minister have been the same throughout the war and it's them that have been dismissed by the IRG.
The IRG have lost A LOT of it's leadership including possibly the latest supreme leader since they've only shown a cardboard cut out of him so far.
The divide is whenever the president or foreign minister try to say the attacks stop to confirm.the ceasefire, the IRG steps in, say no they haven't but in a way thar dismisses their creditability.
Already posted here several hours before this thread was made.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/1ASZR6R2sr/jeet-scammer-pleads-with-irgc-af/c/
Typical Indian attitude yelling how correct they are.
DO NOT REDEEM THE MISSILES
Why did you share a video that just kept repeating 'DO NOT REDEEM! DO NOT REDEEM!' ? /s
Anyway this is just a clusterfuck as there seems to be a BIG divide between the civilian government and the IRG and this action by the IRG is pissing off the last of it's supporters.
Edit: damn it this subject already posted here, 50/50 if I should remove as it's essentially the same information.
India is a two-faced, self-absorbed nation whose leader fork-tongued Bibi's anus and slobbered all over his cock immediately prior to hostilities being rained upon Iran. They conspicuously failed to condemn the attack.
Russia is steadfastly on Iran's side. China, despite their push for negotiations due to their economic interests is not abandoning the belt-and-road initiative, where Iran plays a massive role (and they supposedly may have provided the loitering drones that were pivotal immediately prior to the fake ceasefire). Oman remains relatively friendly given pragmatism and geographical proximity if not more.
Who are these "supporters" of interest that Iran has isolated, exactly?
It's certainly not India, who shamelessly crawled back for oil once the war started, and prior to that used to aggressively barter against their fellow BRICS member for lower prices due to U.S. sanctions while retaining an outstanding oil tab.
I don't know what happened in this incident, but there isn't much of a divide at all. Maybe there might have been one if U.S.-Israel had kept their side of the preconditions and weren't attempting to actively kill (yet again!) the delegation, or starting geopolitical stunts like the minesweeper -- perhaps as a show of strength or provocation to force the Iranians to quit diplomacy first for optics -- but they did. So it's not relevant. Example (there are similar direct statements from Qalibaf and others) - https://t.me/FotrosResistancee/21148
Essentially the Iranian foreign minister said it's open, then the IRGC said no it's not and in the response to this Indian crew, they actually refer to their own foreign minister as an idiot and that THEY are the ones that say if it open or not.
Yes, but they aren't wrong. Araghchi is much better than Pezeshkian and highly intelligent, but in attempting to appease the Chinese, Iran made arguably an optical blunder by knowingfully engaging in what are bad-faith negotiations by the opposition. In reality that's not really true since they never ceded any military gains.
All of Iran is on the side of the IGRC; even pro-Shah proponents are as well, having seen harmless schools and hospitals be arbitrarily bombed and hence awakened to reality. India will get over the minor kerfuffle -- unlike the Iranian ship that sank during a non-military expedition near India, this resulted in a literal nothing-burger besides slightly bruised egos.
The Iranian parliament is on the side of the IGRC as well. They were just trying to engage with diplomacy given geopolitical realities; they aren't stupid, they are well aware of Israeli (and American) duplicitous tactics and were doing China a favor.
If you read the series of commentary from Qalibaf, it's fully acknowledging and rebuking the opposite side's tactics. My point is that you're wrong when you say that Iran is isolating anyone -- they're not. In fact, it's the opposite for the Axis of Resistance (e.g. Hezbollah, Ansar Allash) since Iran acknowledges Hezbollah's role and are insistent on not abandoning Lebanon, and the non-Resistance either has incentive to go against the petro-dollar and/or is not ignorant of Iran's history, where they have been exceedingly, irrationally tolerant of the opposition's attacks.
In summary: fuck India. They may or may not have been wronged in this incident, but unlike China, who has relations with both Iran & Israel but is able to straddle diplomacy without burying BRICS, the same cannot be said for India, which engages in a far more parasitic relationship.
The civilian government that the US killed in the initial airstrikes? Or the globohomo puppets that were installed?
The president and foreign minister have been the same throughout the war and it's them that have been dismissed by the IRG.
The IRG have lost A LOT of it's leadership including possibly the latest supreme leader since they've only shown a cardboard cut out of him so far.
The divide is whenever the president or foreign minister try to say the attacks stop to confirm.the ceasefire, the IRG steps in, say no they haven't but in a way thar dismisses their creditability.
the best thing about fanatical muslim leaders - they don’t have too many globohomo employees to promote to leader
Meanwhile Islam is the largest religion of globohomo
India most likely just lying