###Ultra woke version### :
https://old.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/1s4eqel/at_her_own_request_25yearold_noelia_castillo/
There is no evidence this occurred because the gang rapists haven’t been named…
###Conspiracy version### :
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1s3v30d/woman_who_was_gang_rped_before_jumping_from_a/
I’m Spanish. The girl went to a centre shared with ‘menas’ – which is the term used here in Spain to refer to underage illegal immigrants – and was raped by five illegal immigrants.
And it’s obvious that they were illegal immigrants, because if they’d been Spanish, the news would have been all over the place, condemning the dangers of the far right, fascism and young fascists; instead, we only found out years later – that’s just how this country works.
###German version###
https://old.reddit.com/r/de/comments/1s4iw4c/noelia_castillo_ist_tot_aktive_sterbehilfe_f%C3%BCr/
Literally ZERO mention of the gang rapes that caused this??
If you were luckier you'd be less retarded.
I was very specific with my words, you continue to bring up irrelevant anecdotes.
"There's a red one right there!" In literal form.
Here are some topics for you to research:
Black opinion surveys on morality, OJ simspon, Rodney king, brown, Floyd, and trayvon. Black jury bias Concentration of population effects Mere exposure. IQ as it relates to propensity for violence.
How would more luck make me smarter?
Why shouldn't I use reality to better understand the world? Sure, papers exist that say one thing, but other papers say another thing, and reality says a whole mess of third fourth and fifth things. Why would I use only some limited information to make character guesses on huge swarths of people instead of taking individual experiences as I encounter them and use actual character assessment to make more well-informed decisions?