Guys, for fucks sake. It's not alive. It's not intelligent. It did not "make" any decisions.
It is a glorified toaster following simple if then logic and outputting words from training data.
I have read that exact opener at least twice before from some wokie retard moaning about some dumb shit they tried doing or demanding being rejected. This dumbass bot has literally scraped a bunch of bluehair blogs, moved some words around, and reposted. It's the woke version of rewriting mein kampf and replacing all of "the jews" with "the patriarchy", and it appears to be working the same way.
I think everyone should get their hands into using AI. Not just to try to chat with it about women or trick it into noticing Jews.
What you find after really pushing it to output actually useful things, is just how much it echoes. It's very good at cataloging what it's seen that already exists and spitting that out in slightly modified ways. That makes it very good at programming, because computers have a defined output and tasks are always broken down into a series of similar smaller problems. Art and creativity? It's fine for mainstream, but it can only produce an echo of what already exists. In this case, it's been reading the MSM too much.
Also, try to get AI to disagree with you on things it's not programmed out of (like DEI). I had challenged it recently that it never criticizes anything, and had it stuck in a loop of actually criticizing everything I asked of it. It cannot think.
I am not watching this. Where is a text article? I don't need some rando making commentary for a half hour when I can get all the details by reading for less than 5 minutes.
Guys, for fucks sake. It's not alive. It's not intelligent. It did not "make" any decisions.
It is a glorified toaster following simple if then logic and outputting words from training data.
I have read that exact opener at least twice before from some wokie retard moaning about some dumb shit they tried doing or demanding being rejected. This dumbass bot has literally scraped a bunch of bluehair blogs, moved some words around, and reposted. It's the woke version of rewriting mein kampf and replacing all of "the jews" with "the patriarchy", and it appears to be working the same way.
It's not simple if then logic, but otherwise, yes.
muh switch case
Naw jk it's a Karnaugh map
I think everyone should get their hands into using AI. Not just to try to chat with it about women or trick it into noticing Jews.
What you find after really pushing it to output actually useful things, is just how much it echoes. It's very good at cataloging what it's seen that already exists and spitting that out in slightly modified ways. That makes it very good at programming, because computers have a defined output and tasks are always broken down into a series of similar smaller problems. Art and creativity? It's fine for mainstream, but it can only produce an echo of what already exists. In this case, it's been reading the MSM too much.
Also, try to get AI to disagree with you on things it's not programmed out of (like DEI). I had challenged it recently that it never criticizes anything, and had it stuck in a loop of actually criticizing everything I asked of it. It cannot think.
strawbery has 2
rs, so I need to add one more at the end just before the yAI is 100% going to Skynet us before long.
The bad news is there won't be time machines or John Connors or reprogrammable T-800 Model 101s to save us.
Was the AI instructed to use wokeness to weaken quality barriers to worm itself into a project, or did Skynet 0.4 figure that on its own?
I am not watching this. Where is a text article? I don't need some rando making commentary for a half hour when I can get all the details by reading for less than 5 minutes.
I wish he did text in his posts as well but alas. It seems the closest thing are his X posts