there is a guaranteed payout (you bought “a pack of cards” and you got “a pack of cards”). The exact same scenario applies to loot boxes
alternative value/functional use (you can play Pokémon with your Pokémon cards as opposed to just reselling them). The exact same scenario applies to loot boxes/skins
no cash payouts. All “cash value” resides in the secondary market. Again, the EXACT SAME SCENARIO APPLIES TO LOOTBOXES.
You’re so amazingly butthurt it’s hilarious. Asking AI to write up your argument shows you’re just a lump of stupid crying because you like predatory practices. I’m still waiting on that mathematical difference between roulette and card pack rarity.
WRONG
trading cards aren’t considered gambling because:
there is a guaranteed payout (you bought “a pack of cards” and you got “a pack of cards”). The exact same scenario applies to loot boxes
alternative value/functional use (you can play Pokémon with your Pokémon cards as opposed to just reselling them). The exact same scenario applies to loot boxes/skins
no cash payouts. All “cash value” resides in the secondary market. Again, the EXACT SAME SCENARIO APPLIES TO LOOTBOXES.
Retard
You’re so amazingly butthurt it’s hilarious. Asking AI to write up your argument shows you’re just a lump of stupid crying because you like predatory practices. I’m still waiting on that mathematical difference between roulette and card pack rarity.
I did refute your argument there retard.
“Casino chips are equivalent to Pokémon cards” isn’t anything other than some mongoloid coping and seething. Certainly nothing close to a refutation.