I'd be okay with the critique except he goes out of his way to defend the Bad Bunny performance. It's the same conservative true Scotsman defense of holding us to a standard, but giving the secular leftist more and more rope and wondering why they haven't hanged themselves yet? Stop giving leftist rope while choking back the people on your side.
That's kinda where I am. It's not that he's wrong, it's that we have way bigger fish to fry and equating the two is too brazen to be a good faith mistake. It's just like tradthots who compare us to gaymers as if attractive women in video games is anywhere near equivalent to tranny sex scenes. Let's obsessively clean this tiny corner of the room while neglecting the giant piles shit everywhere else!
He's not wrong about "country" music being palette-swapped rap music. Swap Hennesy for Jack, clubs for bars, and bentleys for pickup trucks and they're cousins. The only difference is one still puts slight effort into the backing music and uses more polite euphemisms for fucking.
I don't know where you're getting any "defense" of Bad Bunny. The author explicitly says he didn't watch him. But he watched the Kid Rock one and gives his disappointed opinon.
My critique comes from the fact that what was billed as a family-friendly alternative to what the “world” has to offer was just as bad when viewed through the lens of Scripture.
Through the lens of Scripture, he should be put to death for wearing mixed fabrics. Also, I bet he owns a coat, but not a sword, when Jesus said to sell the coat and buy a sword with the money. We're all only human, there's gonna be leniencies and transgressions against a perfect following of scripture. It's all about which ones we're willing to tolerate.
This is one of the most misquoted and miscontextualised elements from the Bible.
Nowhere in the bible is it said that people should be put to death for wearing mixed fabrics.
People misunderstand almost EVERYTHING about the rules laid out in Leviticus.
The passage you're referring to from Leviticus 19 is part of a broader set of guides laid out to maintain cleanliness in the camp. The actual verse reads,
"Ye shall keep my statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind: thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed: neither shall a garment mingled of linen and woollen come upon thee"
These were to prevent blights, infections, rashes, diseases, etc., lest they bring blemish to the camp. But those particular rules were not ones that demanded death (the ones that did were made explicit).
This was because during the exodus the Children of Israel requested a physical presence of Yehweh guide them to the promised land. God agreed and had a small piece of His physical Glory appear as a cloud to guide them, and later resided in the Ark of the Covenant (which is why no one, even those who were sinless, could touch it).
To keep the camp clean, Leviticus details what the priests and the camp were to do to avoid incurring sin or blemish, because sin cannot abide in God's presence, and will be extinguished. This happens a couple of times during God's tenure within the camp at the Tabernacle. This is why the priests had explicit instructions on how to perform sin offerings if sin did occur in the camp.
Mixed fabrics and certain seafoods were prohibited to avoid things like rashes and digestive issues. Just like there were guides on where to defecate -- and it had to be OUTSIDE the camp, same with when women were on their period, since blood is sacred and is used as a conduit for spiritual substance.
Hitherto, God's rules were to protect the camp from blemish and sin to AVOID people being extinguished in his presence.
Post-factum, Jesus' death on the cross meant that ALL sins could be extinguished through his blood (viz., the conduit of spiritual matter from this realm to the next) without having to abide by strict rules or having the Levites perform sin offerings using the blood of unblemished animals as the conduit.
TL;DR: Nowhere in the Bible was it mandated to be killed for wearing mixed fabrics. The rules in Leviticus (apart from the Ten Commandments) were to keep the camp as unblemished as possible due to God's Glory residing in the camp at the time.
I forgot to switch my default search engine and this was on the front page of Google's results for the All American Halftime Show. I thought these retards went extinct 20 years ago when Dems LARPing as sane centrists packed their shit in. There's having legitimate critiques of your own side and then there's this false equivalence bullshit that only fifth columnists do. At this point I'm just waiting for this guy to get caught soliciting gay sex in an airport bathroom. I'm reminded of that tradthot who went after sexy women in video games and then was revealed to have a history of supporting alphabet perverts.
Author admits he's a former alcoholic, so I guess it makes sense he wouldn't want to listen to that. Still, he's making mountains out of mole hills here.
The bigger problem is the false equivalence bullshit. It's not an invalid critique but saying it's just as bad as Fag Bunny screams controlled opposition. There's a point when someone's priorities are so out of whack that we can only conclude that they don't actually share our priorities.
Yeah you're right. The part where he says he would rather have had his kids watch the Bad Bunny show instead of Kid Rock really kills any credibility he might have had.
I'd be okay with the critique except he goes out of his way to defend the Bad Bunny performance. It's the same conservative true Scotsman defense of holding us to a standard, but giving the secular leftist more and more rope and wondering why they haven't hanged themselves yet? Stop giving leftist rope while choking back the people on your side.
That's kinda where I am. It's not that he's wrong, it's that we have way bigger fish to fry and equating the two is too brazen to be a good faith mistake. It's just like tradthots who compare us to gaymers as if attractive women in video games is anywhere near equivalent to tranny sex scenes. Let's obsessively clean this tiny corner of the room while neglecting the giant piles shit everywhere else!
He's not wrong about "country" music being palette-swapped rap music. Swap Hennesy for Jack, clubs for bars, and bentleys for pickup trucks and they're cousins. The only difference is one still puts slight effort into the backing music and uses more polite euphemisms for fucking.
I don't know where you're getting any "defense" of Bad Bunny. The author explicitly says he didn't watch him. But he watched the Kid Rock one and gives his disappointed opinon.
The fact his wife said she would sooner let her kid watch the bad bunny show than the tpusa show
His wife making a joke is him going out of his way to defend it?
Through the lens of Scripture, he should be put to death for wearing mixed fabrics. Also, I bet he owns a coat, but not a sword, when Jesus said to sell the coat and buy a sword with the money. We're all only human, there's gonna be leniencies and transgressions against a perfect following of scripture. It's all about which ones we're willing to tolerate.
This is one of the most misquoted and miscontextualised elements from the Bible.
Nowhere in the bible is it said that people should be put to death for wearing mixed fabrics.
People misunderstand almost EVERYTHING about the rules laid out in Leviticus.
The passage you're referring to from Leviticus 19 is part of a broader set of guides laid out to maintain cleanliness in the camp. The actual verse reads,
"Ye shall keep my statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind: thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed: neither shall a garment mingled of linen and woollen come upon thee"
These were to prevent blights, infections, rashes, diseases, etc., lest they bring blemish to the camp. But those particular rules were not ones that demanded death (the ones that did were made explicit).
This was because during the exodus the Children of Israel requested a physical presence of Yehweh guide them to the promised land. God agreed and had a small piece of His physical Glory appear as a cloud to guide them, and later resided in the Ark of the Covenant (which is why no one, even those who were sinless, could touch it).
To keep the camp clean, Leviticus details what the priests and the camp were to do to avoid incurring sin or blemish, because sin cannot abide in God's presence, and will be extinguished. This happens a couple of times during God's tenure within the camp at the Tabernacle. This is why the priests had explicit instructions on how to perform sin offerings if sin did occur in the camp.
Mixed fabrics and certain seafoods were prohibited to avoid things like rashes and digestive issues. Just like there were guides on where to defecate -- and it had to be OUTSIDE the camp, same with when women were on their period, since blood is sacred and is used as a conduit for spiritual substance.
Hitherto, God's rules were to protect the camp from blemish and sin to AVOID people being extinguished in his presence.
Post-factum, Jesus' death on the cross meant that ALL sins could be extinguished through his blood (viz., the conduit of spiritual matter from this realm to the next) without having to abide by strict rules or having the Levites perform sin offerings using the blood of unblemished animals as the conduit.
TL;DR: Nowhere in the Bible was it mandated to be killed for wearing mixed fabrics. The rules in Leviticus (apart from the Ten Commandments) were to keep the camp as unblemished as possible due to God's Glory residing in the camp at the time.
I forgot to switch my default search engine and this was on the front page of Google's results for the All American Halftime Show. I thought these retards went extinct 20 years ago when Dems LARPing as sane centrists packed their shit in. There's having legitimate critiques of your own side and then there's this false equivalence bullshit that only fifth columnists do. At this point I'm just waiting for this guy to get caught soliciting gay sex in an airport bathroom. I'm reminded of that tradthot who went after sexy women in video games and then was revealed to have a history of supporting alphabet perverts.
Prove me wrong: This wasn't Chalie's idea, and if it was, it would've been live, and much better.
Author admits he's a former alcoholic, so I guess it makes sense he wouldn't want to listen to that. Still, he's making mountains out of mole hills here.
The bigger problem is the false equivalence bullshit. It's not an invalid critique but saying it's just as bad as Fag Bunny screams controlled opposition. There's a point when someone's priorities are so out of whack that we can only conclude that they don't actually share our priorities.
Yeah you're right. The part where he says he would rather have had his kids watch the Bad Bunny show instead of Kid Rock really kills any credibility he might have had.