Weaponized autism providing gems again
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
i mean sure, that works, but instead of finding areas you should not to go, find areas that are safe to go:
Look for a stand alone Lululemon store, ones in a mall do not count. Or areas that have a Whole Foods.
Either way, its in an area where white people live/congregate.
Think mate. If the area doesn't show on the map then that's your indicator that the area is safe to go.
That plane diagram with the bullet holes comes to mind.
yeah, he doesnt get it, but i explained it in terms maybe he does understand below.
Think mate. There are less areas that are [guaranteed] safe to go than there are areas that are [guaranteed] not safe to go but not [guaranteed] safe to go.
IE: the postulate - because an area is not guaranteed to be not safe to go, it does not imply it is safe to go.
TL:DR - Contraposition
TL:DR2 - Think harder mate.
I did. It still makes sense to go to areas that are not on the map because predators are just as risk averse and opportunity-cost oriented as the prey they hunt.
Mate, dude, bro, bruh, brah...i LITERALLY spelled it out for you: If there are Popeyes/Jamals in the area it is unsafe; if there are no Popeyes/Jamals doesnt mean it is safe. Contraposition.
Let me dumb it down for you mate, dude bro, bruh, brah:
If P, Then Q. — If not Q, Then not P. "If it is raining, then I wear my coat." — "If I don't wear my coat, then it isn't raining."
Does it rain even when you dont wear your coat? Of course it does!
And tying everything back because you have a problem understanding: "If there are Popeyes/Jamals , its not safe. If there are not Popeyes/Jamals, it is safe"
Wrong!