Weaponized autism providing gems again
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
Think mate. There are less areas that are [guaranteed] safe to go than there are areas that are [guaranteed] not safe to go but not [guaranteed] safe to go.
IE: the postulate - because an area is not guaranteed to be not safe to go, it does not imply it is safe to go.
TL:DR - Contraposition
TL:DR2 - Think harder mate.
I did. It still makes sense to go to areas that are not on the map because predators are just as risk averse and opportunity-cost oriented as the prey they hunt.
Mate, dude, bro, bruh, brah...i LITERALLY spelled it out for you: If there are Popeyes/Jamals in the area it is unsafe; if there are no Popeyes/Jamals doesnt mean it is safe. Contraposition.
Let me dumb it down for you mate, dude bro, bruh, brah:
If P, Then Q. — If not Q, Then not P. "If it is raining, then I wear my coat." — "If I don't wear my coat, then it isn't raining."
Does it rain even when you dont wear your coat? Of course it does!
And tying everything back because you have a problem understanding: "If there are Popeyes/Jamals , its not safe. If there are not Popeyes/Jamals, it is safe"
Wrong!
Only if you hold on to rigid logic like an autist.
Mate, dude, bro, bruh, brah, I knew you were too dumb to understand, but I tried again anyways.
Last time Im trying this time