Do It For Her
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (114)
sorted by:
AI Slop
This guy was never going to have the resources or ability to hand-craft this message on his own. So without this tool, AI, he was just not going to put anything like this forward. Maybe he'd make a tweet, but that's as far as it would've gone.
The content is good--it looks good, sounds good, and the message it conveys is utterly needed right now.
Would you prefer that instead of this, he would've/could've done nothing? That's the result of your objection. You're not objecting to the content, you're griping about the process. Well, the options were use these tools, or do nothing. Personally I'm cool with this message being able to be produced, no matter what tools were used to do it.
You're making a case for laziness.
Why do you doubt his ability so quickly? You think he'd never be able to have the ability to learn a skill?
AI slop is disregarded quickly. It's seen as low effort, and treated as such.
I'd prefer that we have tools in a society to help people learn and hone skills, and not just prompt and AI to do all the dirty work for them.
The content is also shit. It's soulless, it's rehashed old memes, and it feels like a caricature, like AI only learned about england through Mr Bean. "Shakespeare and Dickens, Harry Potter." I mean come on. It's a joke.
If you truly, genuinely think the only option is to use AI to animate existing memes, or nothing...holy shit I pity your life.
It's not "laziness," it's putting creative tools in the hands of people who don't have any other options.
Think this through. Either everyone with something important to say has to develop the artistic and technical skill to put out hand-crafted work of this sort (ahead of time, just in case they're going to end up using it) or they have to hire people who have these skills and rely on them to make the content according to given designs.
Do you understand how slow and complicated and prohibitive in every way this is? This is why I said that without this "lazy" solution, the content would simply not exist.
Your version of how things should be is simply not tenable, not if you want good messaging to prevail. You're advocating hand-cuffing non-"creatives" by arbitrarily withholding technical tools from them that historically have been hoarded by "creatives," who are overwhelmingly metropolitan liberal elites.
This isn't about what the "only" option is, it's about what options are available to people to make themselves heard, at what cost. You are calling for completely arbitrary stagnation, and your tactic for achieving this is scolding.
LOL. Fuck you! Fuck your scolding, stupid pissy dinosaur. There's no putting the genie back in the bottle, so take your scolding prefect ass and sit in on a barbed pole sideways.
Yes. Welcome to learning and honing a skill. Sorry if you think that it's prohibitive to start from the beginning.
Sorry...what tools have been hoarded by creatives that you feel non-creatives didn't have access to? Do you think pens and paper were hoarded by creatives?
Yeah, I'm gonna look down my nose at retards who use AI and pretend that it's somehow powerful or meaningful. Sue me. Seethe more, boomer.