i notice the people that live the longest (the ones that are outliers) are the super rich and super poor. super rich because they can afford the best and super poor because their bodies are harden.
The whole idea is soulless. Sure, maybe you live longer but at the expense of having the best parts of life excised. The whole thing smacks of cold corporate principle; the priority of maximizing productivity and worker lifespan at the cost of everything fulfilling that happens off the clock.
As I've said many times over: long life expectancy is not the objective of life.
Animals in the zoo live longer than animals in the wild. Shall we put all animals in a zoo?
Long life in many cases (like with the zoo) is actually the symptom of a worse life not better.
Imagine playing a PvP game where no one dies. Would that be fun?
Living a glorious life > living a long life.
These experiments are done on zoo animals. I wonder how much concern they put into the fact that they are animals in captivity
Who would have thought? Removing part of an animal's drive makes confinement less stressful. Go figure.
What a gay response
i notice the people that live the longest (the ones that are outliers) are the super rich and super poor. super rich because they can afford the best and super poor because their bodies are harden.
The whole idea is soulless. Sure, maybe you live longer but at the expense of having the best parts of life excised. The whole thing smacks of cold corporate principle; the priority of maximizing productivity and worker lifespan at the cost of everything fulfilling that happens off the clock.