He only cared about white natalism. His arguments made no sense except in the context of he only cares about hating white people, hating Christians and hating happy families for reasons he never shared.
At one point he made the argument that Trump is influencing Europe to become more natalist and that would mean more taxes from him. Europe has much more programs around children and mothers than US and higher level of taxes.
It being a flat amount instead of negative taxation is what really does it. The invaders were never planning on working so it's literally a bonus and they never invest the money into the kids like a white family would, it's all about status.
No one hates women more than ugly trannies that don't pass well enough to successfully rape straight dudes. And nothing makes them more aware of them being a worthless tranny than the fact that they can't get pregnant. No one hates whites being able to exist more than Jews. It all makes so much sense now...
He claimed is because he would get taxed but that would make little sense since why would you be against money going to people with kids and not other form of welfare or social security or military or any other form of taxes. I did a small test and moved the issue on single black mothers on welfare and he did not have an issue with that.
I didn't even want to make a point about that. Single mothers should be an exception and not a way of life but I was curious of his reaction.
Meh, he is how he is. I'm not even sure how much he believes his own stuff and how much he wanted to argue with someone, have an emotional contact with someone even though the emotions are bad.
When cognitive dissonance shows up because certain ideas, when steel manned to an extreme, which happens the further you take them, you have a few options.
Try to ignore that feeling, quickly shut that line of conversation down and suppress whatever feeling of discomfort you have; this is what happens early on in cognitive dissonance, but once someone goes too far, this is rarely merely what they do, instead moving on to option
Doubling, tirpling, quadrupuling down. If you build too much of your identity and your entire worldview upon an idea, and that idea is threatened, you're at risk of having a total identity crisis. You then have to think about ways you've been wrong and your wrongness has wronged others. You don't want to face that. Like an SJW, if they actually reflected on all the hatred they've spewed towards innocent family members because they were so bought into an idea, some wouldn't be able to take it, thus the doubling, tripling, quadrupuling down, because you need something powerful to sustain the cognitive dissonance rather than merely ignoring it.
Reassess your values and thoughts. This is the least chosen option regardless of political, ideological standings. It's the last thing people will prefer to do.
And the further into a sunken cost belief system, the less likely this option becomes.
I believe when people told Impossible1 that some of his ideas were too all encompassing and lacked nuance, even though he's 90% right on feminism, but just needs to dial it back and bring about nuance, his pavlovian reaction of needing to be right drove him to steelman himself into sunken cost further and further until his already exaggerated ideas were twisted beyond recogonition.
I'm not his judge, I'm simply playing at armchair psychiatrist, based on a guess. The truth could be any number of things including a troll. I just wish he wouldn't have felt that he needed to view things like "either me or them".
I don't know why people want to troll this place. This place is nicer to it's trolls than Reddit is to it's beloved people.
It's like, sure you can troll us, but you really don't know how valuable a place like this is on the internet is anymore.
It's like dragging a muddy boot across a nice rug....you're really just harming yourself and it's shame to see something nice get screwed up for yourself because you failed to see the value in it.
The worst people do here is call you a retarded faggot. That's just normal conversation and speak among friend groups where I grew up.
If you never had a friend group where you could call each other retarded faggots, I shed a tiny tear for you, like some sort of faggy retard.
Reassess your values and thoughts. This is the least chosen option regardless of political, ideological standings. It's the last thing people will prefer to do.
Is this why science only progresses one funeral at a time?
He only cared about white natalism. His arguments made no sense except in the context of he only cares about hating white people, hating Christians and hating happy families for reasons he never shared.
At one point he made the argument that Trump is influencing Europe to become more natalist and that would mean more taxes from him. Europe has much more programs around children and mothers than US and higher level of taxes.
And most of those programs benefit foreign welfare leeches.
It being a flat amount instead of negative taxation is what really does it. The invaders were never planning on working so it's literally a bonus and they never invest the money into the kids like a white family would, it's all about status.
Weird. Does anyone nose why he was like this?
My theory is he was a Jewish mtf who wasnt accepted as a woman and went buck wild.
No one hates women more than ugly trannies that don't pass well enough to successfully rape straight dudes. And nothing makes them more aware of them being a worthless tranny than the fact that they can't get pregnant. No one hates whites being able to exist more than Jews. It all makes so much sense now...
After every year-long ban he resets. Kind of like unplugging a microwave to set the clock.
When he woke up again, somebody set him to “natalism”
who nose
Yea I didn’t understand his hatred growing families
He claimed is because he would get taxed but that would make little sense since why would you be against money going to people with kids and not other form of welfare or social security or military or any other form of taxes. I did a small test and moved the issue on single black mothers on welfare and he did not have an issue with that.
As I said, he was one twisted individual.
And that is definitely a group that shows the dangers of rampant single motherhood.
I didn't even want to make a point about that. Single mothers should be an exception and not a way of life but I was curious of his reaction.
Meh, he is how he is. I'm not even sure how much he believes his own stuff and how much he wanted to argue with someone, have an emotional contact with someone even though the emotions are bad.
I think he had the sunken cost fallacy.
When cognitive dissonance shows up because certain ideas, when steel manned to an extreme, which happens the further you take them, you have a few options.
Try to ignore that feeling, quickly shut that line of conversation down and suppress whatever feeling of discomfort you have; this is what happens early on in cognitive dissonance, but once someone goes too far, this is rarely merely what they do, instead moving on to option
Doubling, tirpling, quadrupuling down. If you build too much of your identity and your entire worldview upon an idea, and that idea is threatened, you're at risk of having a total identity crisis. You then have to think about ways you've been wrong and your wrongness has wronged others. You don't want to face that. Like an SJW, if they actually reflected on all the hatred they've spewed towards innocent family members because they were so bought into an idea, some wouldn't be able to take it, thus the doubling, tripling, quadrupuling down, because you need something powerful to sustain the cognitive dissonance rather than merely ignoring it.
Reassess your values and thoughts. This is the least chosen option regardless of political, ideological standings. It's the last thing people will prefer to do.
And the further into a sunken cost belief system, the less likely this option becomes.
I believe when people told Impossible1 that some of his ideas were too all encompassing and lacked nuance, even though he's 90% right on feminism, but just needs to dial it back and bring about nuance, his pavlovian reaction of needing to be right drove him to steelman himself into sunken cost further and further until his already exaggerated ideas were twisted beyond recogonition.
I'm not his judge, I'm simply playing at armchair psychiatrist, based on a guess. The truth could be any number of things including a troll. I just wish he wouldn't have felt that he needed to view things like "either me or them".
I don't know why people want to troll this place. This place is nicer to it's trolls than Reddit is to it's beloved people.
It's like, sure you can troll us, but you really don't know how valuable a place like this is on the internet is anymore.
It's like dragging a muddy boot across a nice rug....you're really just harming yourself and it's shame to see something nice get screwed up for yourself because you failed to see the value in it.
The worst people do here is call you a retarded faggot. That's just normal conversation and speak among friend groups where I grew up.
If you never had a friend group where you could call each other retarded faggots, I shed a tiny tear for you, like some sort of faggy retard.
In short, sometimes, people fall in love with the smell of their own farts.
Is this why science only progresses one funeral at a time?
so....average jew