I feel like Neocon gets used a lot but no one ever really asks what new conservative values are neocons conserving? I feel like it's a word we all know, we all can point it out, but it's hard to define.
Fuentes is such a centerist outside of the race and women stuff. I think a Neocon would be to the right of Fuentes. Take Bush Jr. he'd be to the right of Fuentes, but in modern thinking most would put W as less conservative than Fuentes.
Fuentes is automatically more right wing than every conservative who isn't completely anti-immigration. Because deep down, every single right wing principle hinges entirely on demographics.
Correct. Economic retardation is an ideological problem that can be undone, often times in just a decade or two. The destruction of your demographics is a genetic problem measured in centuries, and that's assuming you ever recover.
Notice how those European nationalists are labeled "far right" despite being almost as left wing, economically, as every other European politician. Leftists correctly understand that demographic replacement is the only issue that matters long-term.
Which is why I think that European 'leaders' are worse than anyone else in the world. Say what you want about Kim Jung Un, but he's not destroying his country in irreparable ways. People have overcome wars, demographic catastrophe, starvation and poverty. There is no way to overcome demographic conquest.
The spice must flow is still one of the most poignant maxims of today's world. The war in Afghanistan was also in part due to scheduled pipelines running through its territory.
Syria was another war where oil pipelines played a part.
I feel like Neocon gets used a lot but no one ever really asks what new conservative values are neocons conserving? I feel like it's a word we all know, we all can point it out, but it's hard to define.
Fuentes is such a centerist outside of the race and women stuff. I think a Neocon would be to the right of Fuentes. Take Bush Jr. he'd be to the right of Fuentes, but in modern thinking most would put W as less conservative than Fuentes.
Fuentes is automatically more right wing than every conservative who isn't completely anti-immigration. Because deep down, every single right wing principle hinges entirely on demographics.
I assume that's why you guys cheer for nationalist European politicians who are way, way to the left of the Democrats on economic issues.
Correct. Economic retardation is an ideological problem that can be undone, often times in just a decade or two. The destruction of your demographics is a genetic problem measured in centuries, and that's assuming you ever recover.
Notice how those European nationalists are labeled "far right" despite being almost as left wing, economically, as every other European politician. Leftists correctly understand that demographic replacement is the only issue that matters long-term.
Which is why I think that European 'leaders' are worse than anyone else in the world. Say what you want about Kim Jung Un, but he's not destroying his country in irreparable ways. People have overcome wars, demographic catastrophe, starvation and poverty. There is no way to overcome demographic conquest.
The new "conservative" values in question are jewish values.
The saddest words in the English language: ArchRespawnsAgain was right again.
The spice must flow is still one of the most poignant maxims of today's world. The war in Afghanistan was also in part due to scheduled pipelines running through its territory.
Syria was another war where oil pipelines played a part.
he's right