I have allergies. The health food isle has everything with fruit, and veggies to make them the correct color. There's also makeup brands that only use fruit, and veggie pigment. Coffee, and cocoa too. We don't need the dyes that cause problems.
But we do need them... To lower birth rates and increase auto-immune disorder and cancer rates. That kind of societal sabotage doesn't just do itself, ya know?
This guy's a hardcore nutjob who's two greatest boogiemen are "women, who want to put us in camps and kill us all" and "antisemites, who want to put us in camps and kill us all".
At first I thought you meant some company thought it necessary to dye coffee because it wasn't dark enough. Then I realized you meant putting coffee in the product as a dye.
I think ultra-high roast barley would give fewer side effects than a psychoactive bladder irritant like coffee, they use it in the brewing industry to darken beers without affecting the flavor appreciably while still being about to say it only contains barley, hops, yeast and water.
You're probably better off with just charcoal at that point? Sounds like it's 90% of the way there anyway, and whilst pure carbon charcoal is pretty benign to the gut, some partially charred food products can have unexpectedly high irritation.
I'm not angry. I just find it hilarious that anyone takes RFK seriously when he did a whole "investigation" into autism and deliberately chose to ignore the two biggest causes, older mothers, and teachers abusing the ease of diagnosis to harm the prospects of gifted males.
teachers? Nah. Different chat regarding adhd, but the autistic and diagnosed-autistic kids are just pure hassle for the teacher, they don't want that. And I promise the big wave of autism diagnoses isn't gifted men, it's some weak and gay men and a lot of borderline personality women who have caught wind of a scam and identity label that gets them benefits and attention. For themselves or vicariously from their kids being diagnosed.
Women did the exact same thing with ADHD though, as you pointed out. It's an open secret that their malicious tendencies tend to see false mental health diagnosis as a way to kick down boys who try to disprove the feminist hoax that "girls are better in school".
You're conflating severe autism with the "he doesn't look girls in the eyes" autism diagnosis they slap on the awkward smart kids.
No I'm not. I know you meant the lvl 1* (and previously ass-burgers) stuff. Because the lvl 3 and real lvl 2 stuff is obvious from a younger age and more of a hassle to obtain that diagnosis for other reasons (it does happen a bit in aus cause lvl 2 is where the benefits are, more lvl 2s than you'd expect, but its still more of a hassle).
But the only time that teachers 'push' for that, cause it doesn't really benefit them, is when parents in denial bring their (often first) kid to school for the first time and to the teacher something is clearly wrong. But no, the teachers won't otherwise push for it because that diagnosis is just hassle for the teachers, not because the kid is screaming and bashing his head against a wall in response to a minor change in schedule as with real autism, but because it creates all sorts of additional paperwork, a real IEP, and if they are misbehaving it just gives an excuse for the kids behaviour that further enables it rather than putting an end to it, rather than getting them on the adhd meds to just zonk them out.
The teachers did something different to a different population of kids, the boisterous (bored) ones. The awkward quiet smart kids aren't getting that other label from teachers' pushing because they're behaving in the feminine structure that they've created in schools.
I'm still blaming women here, it's the parents, not the teachers though.
Which awkward, smart and quiet people do you know who got stuck with that? Did it happen to you?
She's probably getting kickbacks from big food.
It's definitely getting big food at the very least.
A bitch like this probably only needed a thousand bucks to sell out the entire nation's children. "I'm finna go to Red Lobstah wit dis much!"
Wypipo don seesun dey kolors!
I have allergies. The health food isle has everything with fruit, and veggies to make them the correct color. There's also makeup brands that only use fruit, and veggie pigment. Coffee, and cocoa too. We don't need the dyes that cause problems.
But we do need them... To lower birth rates and increase auto-immune disorder and cancer rates. That kind of societal sabotage doesn't just do itself, ya know?
That's what stevia is for. Duh/s
This belief is a damn cult.
There are peer reviewed studies backing my claim. Isn't peer reciew what your cult worships? Or does "orange man bad" override peer review?
This guy's a hardcore nutjob who's two greatest boogiemen are "women, who want to put us in camps and kill us all" and "antisemites, who want to put us in camps and kill us all".
But "orange man bad" isn't one of his faults.
Eh, he's got his own creative/retarded/tiresome spin on TDS.
Trump's a natalist, don't'cha know.
At first I thought you meant some company thought it necessary to dye coffee because it wasn't dark enough. Then I realized you meant putting coffee in the product as a dye.
I think ultra-high roast barley would give fewer side effects than a psychoactive bladder irritant like coffee, they use it in the brewing industry to darken beers without affecting the flavor appreciably while still being about to say it only contains barley, hops, yeast and water.
The coffee, and cocoa look good as eyeshadow, and blush. But, your suggestion works for me too!
You're probably better off with just charcoal at that point? Sounds like it's 90% of the way there anyway, and whilst pure carbon charcoal is pretty benign to the gut, some partially charred food products can have unexpectedly high irritation.
Why anyone would take health advice from a mental case with six kids, I do not know.
Calm down, Imp.
I'm not angry. I just find it hilarious that anyone takes RFK seriously when he did a whole "investigation" into autism and deliberately chose to ignore the two biggest causes, older mothers, and teachers abusing the ease of diagnosis to harm the prospects of gifted males.
older and fatter women yes
teachers? Nah. Different chat regarding adhd, but the autistic and diagnosed-autistic kids are just pure hassle for the teacher, they don't want that. And I promise the big wave of autism diagnoses isn't gifted men, it's some weak and gay men and a lot of borderline personality women who have caught wind of a scam and identity label that gets them benefits and attention. For themselves or vicariously from their kids being diagnosed.
Women did the exact same thing with ADHD though, as you pointed out. It's an open secret that their malicious tendencies tend to see false mental health diagnosis as a way to kick down boys who try to disprove the feminist hoax that "girls are better in school".
You're conflating severe autism with the "he doesn't look girls in the eyes" autism diagnosis they slap on the awkward smart kids.
No I'm not. I know you meant the lvl 1* (and previously ass-burgers) stuff. Because the lvl 3 and real lvl 2 stuff is obvious from a younger age and more of a hassle to obtain that diagnosis for other reasons (it does happen a bit in aus cause lvl 2 is where the benefits are, more lvl 2s than you'd expect, but its still more of a hassle).
But the only time that teachers 'push' for that, cause it doesn't really benefit them, is when parents in denial bring their (often first) kid to school for the first time and to the teacher something is clearly wrong. But no, the teachers won't otherwise push for it because that diagnosis is just hassle for the teachers, not because the kid is screaming and bashing his head against a wall in response to a minor change in schedule as with real autism, but because it creates all sorts of additional paperwork, a real IEP, and if they are misbehaving it just gives an excuse for the kids behaviour that further enables it rather than putting an end to it, rather than getting them on the adhd meds to just zonk them out.
The teachers did something different to a different population of kids, the boisterous (bored) ones. The awkward quiet smart kids aren't getting that other label from teachers' pushing because they're behaving in the feminine structure that they've created in schools.
I'm still blaming women here, it's the parents, not the teachers though.
Which awkward, smart and quiet people do you know who got stuck with that? Did it happen to you?
Can I send you a batch of dye concentrate that you'll drink on a video for us?
I'm guessing you retards would just send poison.
I'll order it direct to your address/PO box
Hilarious. I obviously wouldn't drink random shit sent to me.
Okay, then you order it yourself from the manufacturer, and I'll reimburse you. Plus and extra $100 for your effort.