At yesterday's news conference, a local radio host asked a very interesting question, that predictably was not answered:
Were security cameras shut off or removed at the behest of far left progressive groups to shield illegal aliens:
https://x.com/nicksortor/status/2001465290375225817 <- has video of the question
Two links discussing this:
This brings up a very interesting question: does disabling or removing cameras for the benefit of illegal aliens affect liability for Brown? I'd like to think so, but I don't really know...
Yes. It should effect liability for the illegal aliens as well. And whoever helped them get here. And whoever ignored the law to let them in here.
All because some shit skin can't figure out how to get to an embassy and file paperwork. Fuck all this.
It doesn’t matter why they did it. Doing so was gross negligence which should immediately make them culpable in a wrongful death case, but who knows anymore with how bastardized the legal system is.
depraved indifference is worse than gross negligence
Bets on this group being connected to the shooter
Probably only in the way all leftist groups are connected by the same goal, not in any organizational sense.
Where is this claim that hard left groups demanded it? Even the question is hard to understand, and the tweet itself says that they don't know if it's true. It's just a question being asked.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/12/17/brown-university-received-a-letter-from-34-human-rights-groups-in-august-requesting-they-disable-their-cctv-system/
Aw...you're tired of it? Are you gonna cry?
Sorry if the facts are "contrarian" to you. But I guess if you wanna try and get me banned, that''ll probably be good for your safe space, so I get it.