They still have reservations and territory granted to them. They still make demands of our politicians and make demonstrations, both in the US but especially in Canada. Until all these privileges are stripped away from them and they are treated like every other citizen, I welcome any discussion questioning their legitimacy.
Erm technically you weren't here first you came across the land bridge and it wasn't called America then anyway so checkmate your name is wrong so we are undoing all that.
If that's your problem, that's a legitimate problem. But pussyfooting around with these word games is completely useless to solving it, its just grifting to get easily led retards to say "UM BASED?!!" at you and then repeat it elsewhere. Its debate club nonsense based on technicalities that mean nothing beyond jerking off on how smart you are.
The question of whether this land actually "belongs" to them. If Americans and Canadians whose families have lived here for centuries become considered as "indigenous" and "native" to North America, then it removes all claims that current "Native Americans" have over their lands, and removes the justification for their privileges of tax-free havens and not having to work. I support the vast majority of overtures in shifting the Overton window in that direction on this issue.
The question of whether this land actually "belongs" to them.
It doesn't, they were conquered and lost. Anything they have was an act of mercy well above the norm for most of human history. That's the shift you should be pushing at, same with niggers and slavery who got the sweetest deal possible compared to all non-white slave owners.
Their havens are dwindling due to that lack of work driving them into drugs and suicide constantly, and they aren't being replaced. The people causing you problems are those who left such shitholes and are using Identity Politics to be more equal than others to get their way, and is a problem that cannot be solved at the branch but needs to be taken out from the root.
I don't disagree with anything you said, though? I always considered it unusually generous to grant them so many reserves and so much land, and I always felt disgust at their utter ungratefulness and gall to still demand more. Removing their privileges and simply acknowledging them as the conquered people that they are, is also in the direction of the shift I want to see in the Overton window. Why are you acting as if Walsh's comments here are a step back? He simply did not go as far as we would want him to be, but it's still a step in the right direction. The moment it becomes mainstream to ask if they are the only people who legitimately deserve the title of "Native", people will start questioning the legitimacy of "Native people's" claim over it as well.
They still have reservations and territory granted to them. They still make demands of our politicians and make demonstrations, both in the US but especially in Canada. Until all these privileges are stripped away from them and they are treated like every other citizen, I welcome any discussion questioning their legitimacy.
What question?
If that's your problem, that's a legitimate problem. But pussyfooting around with these word games is completely useless to solving it, its just grifting to get easily led retards to say "UM BASED?!!" at you and then repeat it elsewhere. Its debate club nonsense based on technicalities that mean nothing beyond jerking off on how smart you are.
The question of whether this land actually "belongs" to them. If Americans and Canadians whose families have lived here for centuries become considered as "indigenous" and "native" to North America, then it removes all claims that current "Native Americans" have over their lands, and removes the justification for their privileges of tax-free havens and not having to work. I support the vast majority of overtures in shifting the Overton window in that direction on this issue.
It doesn't, they were conquered and lost. Anything they have was an act of mercy well above the norm for most of human history. That's the shift you should be pushing at, same with niggers and slavery who got the sweetest deal possible compared to all non-white slave owners.
Their havens are dwindling due to that lack of work driving them into drugs and suicide constantly, and they aren't being replaced. The people causing you problems are those who left such shitholes and are using Identity Politics to be more equal than others to get their way, and is a problem that cannot be solved at the branch but needs to be taken out from the root.
I don't disagree with anything you said, though? I always considered it unusually generous to grant them so many reserves and so much land, and I always felt disgust at their utter ungratefulness and gall to still demand more. Removing their privileges and simply acknowledging them as the conquered people that they are, is also in the direction of the shift I want to see in the Overton window. Why are you acting as if Walsh's comments here are a step back? He simply did not go as far as we would want him to be, but it's still a step in the right direction. The moment it becomes mainstream to ask if they are the only people who legitimately deserve the title of "Native", people will start questioning the legitimacy of "Native people's" claim over it as well.