Bally is talking shit. Bioengineered meat is incredibly expensive (Upside Foods had $100/kg as an aspirational goal in 2017, for example), while chicken is incredibly cheap and the scraps and bones used to produce chicken stock cheaper still. It would be one thing if you were talking about some venture capital-backed tech company that seeks to use regulatory capture to give their inferior product a monopoly, but I don't believe for one moment that Campbell's is secretly using bioengineering as a substitute for processed food waste.
Their chicken has the texture of shitty mcdonald's nuggets. I wonder if they're just using a paste and some form of molding to create the squarish shapes they have in the product.
Possible, but it’s also possible they are using fake 3D printed meat even if it costs them more. Research how BlackRock works with the Fortune 500 corporations that choose to abide by what BlackRock wants out of all of them, if they implement DEI hiring and green policies, those corporations get a social credit score known as “an ESG Rating”, which stands for Environmental, Social, Governance rating, and if a corporation is super compliant with what BlackRock wants, their ESG rating goes higher and as a result, they get huge investments from BlackRock as a reward for their compliance, enough to cover any losses they take by pushing those insane policies. It’s not about profits as much as it is about forcing communist U.N. policies on the masses.
this, I think op says bioengineer meat, all the audio has is him saying coming out of a 3d printer.
that sounds like slurry out of extruder. perfectly fine and delicious.
also the vp isn't wrong about selling shit to poor people who eat shit. You're not suppose to have campbell as a staple, it's meant as a quick fix or comfort food once in a while.
I mean, you just heard a C-level executive at Campbells saying what the meat is if you listened to the recording. People think profits matter to these mega corporations, and maybe they do to some degree but not nearly as much as people think. If profits were all that mattered, then why would huge corporations utilize DEI hires knowing it’s going to cost them money as the incompetent staff fuck things up? Why put trannie cheerleaders in pro football or trannies in beer commercials? Clearly not for the target audience or for profit reasons…..why go along with green policies if it’s going to cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to do so? it doesn’t matter if they take a hit pushing DEI or green policies because BlackRock has limitless wealth and they cover whatever losses those corporations take and then some for promoting the kosher agendas…..I’m sure it works the same way with poisoning the general population, so even though it may cost them more to include bioengineered 3D printed fake meat, the losses they take are fully covered by investment growth from BlackRock j’ws.
Agreed, it probably is to some extent bioengineered, but not directly 3d printed, he probably read the former in a report and assumed the latter.
Someone posted something about cloned meat in the market on scored the other day and I had the same reaction, looking it further, a more plausible thing seemed to be true. That they were cloning prize bulls an selling the calves to ranchers to raise to be breeding bulls in their herds. Could totally see that, the cloned calf would be 50 times more expensive than a run of the mill male calf, but still cheaper than a prize bull that it would eventually grow into. So you aren't eating cloned meat, just the descendant calves of the cloned bull. The ranchers I've known had two to three bulls for a couple hundred head of cattle (never more than one with the cows at a time), wouldn't be a huge expense on the number of cows overall to get cloned calves to grow into breeding bulls.
Bally is talking shit. Bioengineered meat is incredibly expensive (Upside Foods had $100/kg as an aspirational goal in 2017, for example), while chicken is incredibly cheap and the scraps and bones used to produce chicken stock cheaper still. It would be one thing if you were talking about some venture capital-backed tech company that seeks to use regulatory capture to give their inferior product a monopoly, but I don't believe for one moment that Campbell's is secretly using bioengineering as a substitute for processed food waste.
Their chicken has the texture of shitty mcdonald's nuggets. I wonder if they're just using a paste and some form of molding to create the squarish shapes they have in the product.
Of course. They're using mechanically separated meat.
Possible, but it’s also possible they are using fake 3D printed meat even if it costs them more. Research how BlackRock works with the Fortune 500 corporations that choose to abide by what BlackRock wants out of all of them, if they implement DEI hiring and green policies, those corporations get a social credit score known as “an ESG Rating”, which stands for Environmental, Social, Governance rating, and if a corporation is super compliant with what BlackRock wants, their ESG rating goes higher and as a result, they get huge investments from BlackRock as a reward for their compliance, enough to cover any losses they take by pushing those insane policies. It’s not about profits as much as it is about forcing communist U.N. policies on the masses.
this, I think op says bioengineer meat, all the audio has is him saying coming out of a 3d printer.
that sounds like slurry out of extruder. perfectly fine and delicious.
also the vp isn't wrong about selling shit to poor people who eat shit. You're not suppose to have campbell as a staple, it's meant as a quick fix or comfort food once in a while.
I mean, you just heard a C-level executive at Campbells saying what the meat is if you listened to the recording. People think profits matter to these mega corporations, and maybe they do to some degree but not nearly as much as people think. If profits were all that mattered, then why would huge corporations utilize DEI hires knowing it’s going to cost them money as the incompetent staff fuck things up? Why put trannie cheerleaders in pro football or trannies in beer commercials? Clearly not for the target audience or for profit reasons…..why go along with green policies if it’s going to cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to do so? it doesn’t matter if they take a hit pushing DEI or green policies because BlackRock has limitless wealth and they cover whatever losses those corporations take and then some for promoting the kosher agendas…..I’m sure it works the same way with poisoning the general population, so even though it may cost them more to include bioengineered 3D printed fake meat, the losses they take are fully covered by investment growth from BlackRock j’ws.
Agreed, it probably is to some extent bioengineered, but not directly 3d printed, he probably read the former in a report and assumed the latter.
Someone posted something about cloned meat in the market on scored the other day and I had the same reaction, looking it further, a more plausible thing seemed to be true. That they were cloning prize bulls an selling the calves to ranchers to raise to be breeding bulls in their herds. Could totally see that, the cloned calf would be 50 times more expensive than a run of the mill male calf, but still cheaper than a prize bull that it would eventually grow into. So you aren't eating cloned meat, just the descendant calves of the cloned bull. The ranchers I've known had two to three bulls for a couple hundred head of cattle (never more than one with the cows at a time), wouldn't be a huge expense on the number of cows overall to get cloned calves to grow into breeding bulls.