Socialists are just openly Marxist Jews. Lolberts and neocons are just openly Zionist and advocate community/social breakdown and degeneracy while calling it freedom. Freedom from what? The answer is duty. The answer is God. Freedom from social bonds and social contracts all while they sell off Argentine assets to foreign bankers. A tale as old as time.
Pick your poison. Nowhere did I indicate sadness for Marxists being out of power, but I have no love for the newest globalist takeover. "Muh credit score went up because foreign bankers like how much they can abuse us now!"
Polymarket and the like started to lose validity the second the general public started to learn about them and believe in their supposed accuracy.
The same people who were willing to throw money at cultivating positive media reporting and favorable "independent" pollsters will absolutely be willing to throw money at bad bets if it translates into shaping what the public believes will actually happen.
I suppose it does mean anyone not oblivious to the astroturfing can find absurdly favorable odds at least.
That one time when Hillary "Killary" Clinton had a 90% forecast for election victory due to """polls""" and Newsweak printed out covers for the psycho bitch.
Its this simple. Jew party wins. Everytim.
So you’re mad the socialists didn’t win?
Socialists are just openly Marxist Jews. Lolberts and neocons are just openly Zionist and advocate community/social breakdown and degeneracy while calling it freedom. Freedom from what? The answer is duty. The answer is God. Freedom from social bonds and social contracts all while they sell off Argentine assets to foreign bankers. A tale as old as time.
Pick your poison. Nowhere did I indicate sadness for Marxists being out of power, but I have no love for the newest globalist takeover. "Muh credit score went up because foreign bankers like how much they can abuse us now!"
I respect that.
Lol butthurt queer
I appreciate the effort you put into this well thought out and articulated retort, faggot.
Polymarket and the like started to lose validity the second the general public started to learn about them and believe in their supposed accuracy.
The same people who were willing to throw money at cultivating positive media reporting and favorable "independent" pollsters will absolutely be willing to throw money at bad bets if it translates into shaping what the public believes will actually happen.
I suppose it does mean anyone not oblivious to the astroturfing can find absurdly favorable odds at least.
If that's true, then pollsters in Argentina must also really be shit.
Less bad polls and more manipulated polls.
That one time when Hillary "Killary" Clinton had a 90% forecast for election victory due to """polls""" and Newsweak printed out covers for the psycho bitch.
sauce: https://polymarket.com/event/which-party-holds-the-most-seats-after-argentina-deputies-election