I know they like to attribute the mass spike of lgbt identifying ppl to greater acceptance but I would say it has a lot to do with it being trendy. The fact that in certain areas being anything but straight and white is super trendy amongst the young speaks volumes. Take away the trendiness and you solve a chunk of the problem. Also show lgbt on tv that is an actual representation of their population and say if you want more content make your own service or streaming.
Gee, I wonder if those teachers treated those trans students like heroes while encouraging any others to come forward. It’s not like kids would ever react to that kind of incentive.
I remember reading a Christian book and a pastor was talking about how one of his members said that her daughter said that half the girls in her 5th grade class were bisexual. The mother had to explain that was statistically impossible and those claims have much more to do with the trendy factor
My fallback on this was the controversy around the Netflix series 13 Reasons Why. That was a show about a girl who committed suicide. There had to be warnings put in front of it and there was massive national discourse over the dangers of addressing suicide in a TV show. Youths are so impressionable that even being exposed to the concept of suicide would result in offing themselves en masse (a concept mocked in the movie Heathers in 1988). But nobody challenged that. Yet when you have a show like Euphoria pushing transness, which coincided with transification of youths, nobody questioned whether it was an effect of them being impressionable rather than acceptance. Weird how that worked.
It's a rejection of the surveillance state. It's basically saying that if it's no longer possible to keep sexuality private because of the pervasive abuse of access, then they will have to live right out in the open.
This is an attempt to "teach men a lesson" for the highly sexualized media prevalent on the early Internet, which was horribly misguided, because nobody had bothered to inform the kids online that the world was expecting them to build a whole fucking digital world for everyone to live in, because that would be fucking insane.
I know they like to attribute the mass spike of lgbt identifying ppl to greater acceptance but I would say it has a lot to do with it being trendy. The fact that in certain areas being anything but straight and white is super trendy amongst the young speaks volumes. Take away the trendiness and you solve a chunk of the problem. Also show lgbt on tv that is an actual representation of their population and say if you want more content make your own service or streaming.
Trendy and Gender Theory brainwashing in elementary schools.
There were teachers bragging about several students per class ''comming out as trans and non-binary'' after the gromming sessions.
Gee, I wonder if those teachers treated those trans students like heroes while encouraging any others to come forward. It’s not like kids would ever react to that kind of incentive.
I remember reading a Christian book and a pastor was talking about how one of his members said that her daughter said that half the girls in her 5th grade class were bisexual. The mother had to explain that was statistically impossible and those claims have much more to do with the trendy factor
Lady Gaga caused that. Saying she was bisexual, and also saying she had never been with a woman. That really irritated bisexuals!
No surprise
My fallback on this was the controversy around the Netflix series 13 Reasons Why. That was a show about a girl who committed suicide. There had to be warnings put in front of it and there was massive national discourse over the dangers of addressing suicide in a TV show. Youths are so impressionable that even being exposed to the concept of suicide would result in offing themselves en masse (a concept mocked in the movie Heathers in 1988). But nobody challenged that. Yet when you have a show like Euphoria pushing transness, which coincided with transification of youths, nobody questioned whether it was an effect of them being impressionable rather than acceptance. Weird how that worked.
Exactly and when people had concerns about constant gay propaganda taught to kids they were laughed at
It's a rejection of the surveillance state. It's basically saying that if it's no longer possible to keep sexuality private because of the pervasive abuse of access, then they will have to live right out in the open.
This is an attempt to "teach men a lesson" for the highly sexualized media prevalent on the early Internet, which was horribly misguided, because nobody had bothered to inform the kids online that the world was expecting them to build a whole fucking digital world for everyone to live in, because that would be fucking insane.
yeah, I'm sure the kikes who make movies and tv shows will jump right on that suggestion
Yea I know. A man can dream