You can be the attacker in one scenario and the defender in another. They're not mutually exclusive.
The Palestinians are rabid animals that can't fit in any decent society and you will never see me cry about their extermination, but the Israelis are subversive, power-hungry, corrupting, greedy, infiltrating rats that are not limited to their own borders. Israelis are a direct threat to the West, with how much influence and political power they've managed to gain through bribery and nepotism, whereas the Palestinians are just primitive savages that are unlikely to ever involve themselves with the farther corners of the world, unless they are forced to do so by a greater force displacing them.
I have no obligation to support either side, and I can speak frankly about both.
Rabid animals that don't fit in any decent society, and their the defenders?
By your own concept, how would you call them "defenders" if you see them as wolves? You're breaking up your own argument, and this nonsense is why I don't ever take alt-right rhetoric that explicitly mirrors Communists, seriously. That assumes I'm not just actively talking to a Communist who's larping because in his words, "the lie is fine as long as it serves a tactical purpose".
I know you're not stupid so the only other explanations I have for why you'd be so obtuse on this subject is that it's either deliberate deception or some desperate attempt to believe that, while you're stuck in here with everyone else, at least you're better than everyone else here.
So you're either lying to us or you're lying to yourself. Or both.
I on the other hand have an idea about why you are hurling yourself into the defense of someone else's argument, and it's not about being obtuse.
There's nothing obtuse about my argumentation, and in this specific case, it's extremely specific. From the White Socialist perspective, genocides are moral. End of. Superior races must make room for development against inferior ones. If jews and palestras are uncivilized savages, than it's no different from a city engineer being warned that in the neighboring woods bears and wolves are fighting. It means less than nothing.
Instead, what we see, over and over again, is explicitly Leftist arguments that are directed at Liberals to condemn Genocide, Colonization, and Apartheid. Fucking no one is willing to stand and answer on why National Socialists are copying Communist arguments, directed towards Liberals, in the Dissident Right. It makes no sense, unless you're a Leftist and this is just the standard line you're used to giving and hoping some retard actually buys it. And they should, because all Leftist arguments are functionally the same, and they have no complaints about genocide either.
You're an idiot, trying to nitpick on a "gotcha" that isn't there and that didn't land. You did not successfully contradict anything I said.
They're too uncivilized to integrate themselves peacefully in other societies, but they can still live in their own. They are allowed to defend their own corner of the world, which is being invaded by a foreign force, even if I wouldn't want them anywhere near me. There is no contradiction here.
And they are not a direct threat to us (unlike Israel currently is), unless they end up being displaced (also because of Israel) as refugees, and end up moving here in the West, where they will (rightfully) resent us for supporting the destruction of their country.
There is no gotcha. You have no fucking standard beyond "kill some jew". Like I said before, I'm not even seeing actual racism. Just Larping like someone who thinks they know how a National Socialist rhetoric would work.
They're too uncivilized to integrate themselves peacefully in other societies, but they can still live in their own
By your own definition, they can live like a pack of wolves and be a threat to everyone the moment they start to stray, which they will always do, because of their violent and predatory nature. There is no such thing as ultra-low-IQ human predators what will just always keep in peaceful societies to themselves when you don't think they are genetically capable of peace. By your standard, and Israeli genocide is moral, yet you insist on crying about genocides like you're appealing to a Liberal.
And they are not a direct threat to us (unlike Israel currently is), unless they end up being displaced (also because of Israel) as refugees, and end up moving here in the West, where they will (rightfully) resent us for supporting the destruction of their country.
You pretend like the mass Leftist, pro-Gaza, rioting isn't normal across the west. Milan is under siege by Communists supporting Palestine right now. The UK parliament was under siege for similar reasons last year. Islamists keep raping and stabbing kids in the UK. The spread of Islam in the US is continuing and Dearborne is a captured city where the mayor just threatened a white person for objecting to naming a city street after a journalist that openly advocated for terrorism and demographic replacement in Michigan.
You act like only Israel is advocating for importing Palestinians, when the entirety of the political Left is demanding it, regardless of Israel's position, explicitly because it will support further internal destabalization.
Your reductive 'joo man bad' short-sightedness is either from a shocking level of stupidity that you can't even maintain your own principled position; or you are simply shilling for Palestine.
You can be the attacker in one scenario and the defender in another. They're not mutually exclusive.
The Palestinians are rabid animals that can't fit in any decent society and you will never see me cry about their extermination, but the Israelis are subversive, power-hungry, corrupting, greedy, infiltrating rats that are not limited to their own borders. Israelis are a direct threat to the West, with how much influence and political power they've managed to gain through bribery and nepotism, whereas the Palestinians are just primitive savages that are unlikely to ever involve themselves with the farther corners of the world, unless they are forced to do so by a greater force displacing them.
I have no obligation to support either side, and I can speak frankly about both.
Rabid animals that don't fit in any decent society, and their the defenders?
By your own concept, how would you call them "defenders" if you see them as wolves? You're breaking up your own argument, and this nonsense is why I don't ever take alt-right rhetoric that explicitly mirrors Communists, seriously. That assumes I'm not just actively talking to a Communist who's larping because in his words, "the lie is fine as long as it serves a tactical purpose".
I know you're not stupid so the only other explanations I have for why you'd be so obtuse on this subject is that it's either deliberate deception or some desperate attempt to believe that, while you're stuck in here with everyone else, at least you're better than everyone else here.
So you're either lying to us or you're lying to yourself. Or both.
I on the other hand have an idea about why you are hurling yourself into the defense of someone else's argument, and it's not about being obtuse.
There's nothing obtuse about my argumentation, and in this specific case, it's extremely specific. From the White Socialist perspective, genocides are moral. End of. Superior races must make room for development against inferior ones. If jews and palestras are uncivilized savages, than it's no different from a city engineer being warned that in the neighboring woods bears and wolves are fighting. It means less than nothing.
Instead, what we see, over and over again, is explicitly Leftist arguments that are directed at Liberals to condemn Genocide, Colonization, and Apartheid. Fucking no one is willing to stand and answer on why National Socialists are copying Communist arguments, directed towards Liberals, in the Dissident Right. It makes no sense, unless you're a Leftist and this is just the standard line you're used to giving and hoping some retard actually buys it. And they should, because all Leftist arguments are functionally the same, and they have no complaints about genocide either.
You're an idiot, trying to nitpick on a "gotcha" that isn't there and that didn't land. You did not successfully contradict anything I said.
They're too uncivilized to integrate themselves peacefully in other societies, but they can still live in their own. They are allowed to defend their own corner of the world, which is being invaded by a foreign force, even if I wouldn't want them anywhere near me. There is no contradiction here.
And they are not a direct threat to us (unlike Israel currently is), unless they end up being displaced (also because of Israel) as refugees, and end up moving here in the West, where they will (rightfully) resent us for supporting the destruction of their country.
There is no gotcha. You have no fucking standard beyond "kill some jew". Like I said before, I'm not even seeing actual racism. Just Larping like someone who thinks they know how a National Socialist rhetoric would work.
By your own definition, they can live like a pack of wolves and be a threat to everyone the moment they start to stray, which they will always do, because of their violent and predatory nature. There is no such thing as ultra-low-IQ human predators what will just always keep in peaceful societies to themselves when you don't think they are genetically capable of peace. By your standard, and Israeli genocide is moral, yet you insist on crying about genocides like you're appealing to a Liberal.
You pretend like the mass Leftist, pro-Gaza, rioting isn't normal across the west. Milan is under siege by Communists supporting Palestine right now. The UK parliament was under siege for similar reasons last year. Islamists keep raping and stabbing kids in the UK. The spread of Islam in the US is continuing and Dearborne is a captured city where the mayor just threatened a white person for objecting to naming a city street after a journalist that openly advocated for terrorism and demographic replacement in Michigan.
You act like only Israel is advocating for importing Palestinians, when the entirety of the political Left is demanding it, regardless of Israel's position, explicitly because it will support further internal destabalization.
Your reductive 'joo man bad' short-sightedness is either from a shocking level of stupidity that you can't even maintain your own principled position; or you are simply shilling for Palestine.