I on the other hand have an idea about why you are hurling yourself into the defense of someone else's argument, and it's not about being obtuse.

There's nothing obtuse about my argumentation, and in this specific case, it's extremely specific. From the White Socialist perspective, genocides are moral. End of. Superior races must make room for development against inferior ones. If jews and palestras are uncivilized savages, than it's no different from a city engineer being warned that in the neighboring woods bears and wolves are fighting. It means less than nothing.

Instead, what we see, over and over again, is explicitly Leftist arguments that are directed at Liberals to condemn Genocide, Colonization, and Apartheid. Fucking no one is willing to stand and answer on why National Socialists are copying Communist arguments, directed towards Liberals, in the Dissident Right. It makes no sense, unless you're a Leftist and this is just the standard line you're used to giving and hoping some retard actually buys it. And they should, because all Leftist arguments are functionally the same, and they have no complaints about genocide either.