it is always correct to celebrate the death of a nazi.
It is almost always incorrect to celebrate the death of anyone, you ghouls.
AOC
Civil Rights Act wasn't a mistake...it was completely intentional, but it was a disaster.
Regarding the Paul Pelosi attack...just like with the 2A quote, they're intentionally leaving out a shit ton of context to try to make Charlie Kirk look like a monster.
Also, it's hilarious they're trying to retcon Kirk into a Jew hater. He was probably talking about a very specific type, at a guess, liberal secular Jews, or something. Also, it's amazing how the actual antisemites on the left suddenly start smearing people with the label when they think it wins them points. Words are magic spells.
Basically, AOC is just lying.
"The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
Rich, coming from the left, who has been leading the charge for a century at least.
Also, what does it say about the first moderate debater shot and killed in public? Does that shit also chain us irrevocably? I'm thinking yes.
If leftists had principles, they wouldn't be leftists.
The presidential timeline picture.
At first I hated the picture, because I thought it was retarded. Then I saw just how retarded it is, and now I love it.
I don't give a fuck what anybody on the right said about that faggot considering what commie kid fuckers are saying about Charlie. Besides, we all know it was a domestic situation that was blown way out of proportion to cover up the fact that Nancy's husband is a homo.
Just saying, just like with the 2A comment, Charlie's comments are about the opposite of what they're trying to make it sound like.
He condemned the attack, said it was "awful," among other things.
His point was that him being held on bail is not in keeping with California's usual stance on crime. He was mocking cashless bail. And he was implying that the jailing was political. And he said to bail him out if possible, and then ask him questions.
He wasn't celebrating the dude, he was saying - just like we all do here - that there was something weird going on, and he wanted to get to the bottom of things. He wanted to talk to the dude, not celebrate him.
"The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
So I can say that a dude in a dress pretending to be a girl is mentally ill? I can say that Negroes are the most violent demographic in the US, and that if we shipped them back to Africa, the US would be safer than Canada? So I can own any gun I want to, the way the Founding Fathers declared?
I can say that Negroes are the most violent demographic in the US...?
World.
But, yes.
It's absolutely bog-standard leftist hypocrisy. They will never defend any of our rights, but we're supposed to worry about theirs.
They've been censoring us for centuries, and especially hard these last few decades, but we're just supposes to abide by our own principles and defend them...even though they hate our principles, and want us all purged from society.
It is almost always incorrect to celebrate the death of anyone, you ghouls.
Civil Rights Act wasn't a mistake...it was completely intentional, but it was a disaster.
Regarding the Paul Pelosi attack...just like with the 2A quote, they're intentionally leaving out a shit ton of context to try to make Charlie Kirk look like a monster.
Also, it's hilarious they're trying to retcon Kirk into a Jew hater. He was probably talking about a very specific type, at a guess, liberal secular Jews, or something. Also, it's amazing how the actual antisemites on the left suddenly start smearing people with the label when they think it wins them points. Words are magic spells.
Basically, AOC is just lying.
Rich, coming from the left, who has been leading the charge for a century at least.
Also, what does it say about the first moderate debater shot and killed in public? Does that shit also chain us irrevocably? I'm thinking yes.
If leftists had principles, they wouldn't be leftists.
At first I hated the picture, because I thought it was retarded. Then I saw just how retarded it is, and now I love it.
I don't give a fuck what anybody on the right said about that faggot considering what commie kid fuckers are saying about Charlie. Besides, we all know it was a domestic situation that was blown way out of proportion to cover up the fact that Nancy's husband is a homo.
Just saying, just like with the 2A comment, Charlie's comments are about the opposite of what they're trying to make it sound like.
He condemned the attack, said it was "awful," among other things.
His point was that him being held on bail is not in keeping with California's usual stance on crime. He was mocking cashless bail. And he was implying that the jailing was political. And he said to bail him out if possible, and then ask him questions.
He wasn't celebrating the dude, he was saying - just like we all do here - that there was something weird going on, and he wanted to get to the bottom of things. He wanted to talk to the dude, not celebrate him.
https://x.com/bctw/status/1965882295619039448
Oh, I don't doubt anything you're saying. I'm just tired of observing standards that our enemies will never hold themselves to.
They're screeching now because they know that they belong in those chains. And worse besides.
So I can say that a dude in a dress pretending to be a girl is mentally ill? I can say that Negroes are the most violent demographic in the US, and that if we shipped them back to Africa, the US would be safer than Canada? So I can own any gun I want to, the way the Founding Fathers declared?
World.
But, yes.
It's absolutely bog-standard leftist hypocrisy. They will never defend any of our rights, but we're supposed to worry about theirs.
They've been censoring us for centuries, and especially hard these last few decades, but we're just supposes to abide by our own principles and defend them...even though they hate our principles, and want us all purged from society.
Oi ya got a loicense for dem opinions?
Oh yes, the timeline is insane.