We have a recent history of American family having munchausen syndrome by proxy and creating condition where heads of the family mislead by MSM forcing vaccines on kids that do not want it.
And now in this case, FBI had no leads whatsoever on who shot Charlie Kirk and now this father claims that his son is a shooter. Now we have all the convenient narratives lined up like how he's radicalised, that I could believe and he was living with a troon roommate. How can I put this? They are just throwing all kind of shit at what sticks as the most compelling motive since just hating charlie kirk is not that good of a motive to shoot him, not to mention his digital footprints are not everywhere like the troon school shooter.
Given our modern surveillance state, I think “no leads” usually means “we obtained all of our current evidence illegally, so we need to construct a parallel investigation that surreptitiously incorporates that evidence”.
We have a recent history of American family having munchausen syndrome by proxy and creating condition where heads of the family mislead by MSM forcing vaccines on kids that do not want it.
And now in this case, FBI had no leads whatsoever on who shot Charlie Kirk and now this father claims that his son is a shooter. Now we have all the convenient narratives lined up like how he's radicalised, that I could believe and he was living with a troon roommate. How can I put this? They are just throwing all kind of shit at what sticks as the most compelling motive since just hating charlie kirk is not that good of a motive to shoot him, not to mention his digital footprints are not everywhere like the troon school shooter.
Given our modern surveillance state, I think “no leads” usually means “we obtained all of our current evidence illegally, so we need to construct a parallel investigation that surreptitiously incorporates that evidence”.