That’s not saying “we will have gun deaths anyway”
"...You're not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen. You can significantly reduce them...we should have an honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, but we should not have a utopian one.
You can't look at one bit without looking at the rest, since they all build on each other.
I have no clue why you're so attached to this. Charlie Kirk's point was to be realistic, he wasn't endorsing gun deaths, or supporting it. He genuinely condemned all violence, as far as I can tell, and was deeply saddened by political violence, as well as senseless mass shootings and the like.
He would not support the circumstances in his own death.
I don’t think any gun deaths are worth it to protect 2A rights.
So...abolish the 2nd Amendment?! I want an answer here, do you support gun rights or not?
Because he's right that you're not getting gun deaths to zero. Do you disagree with that?
What exactly is your stance? Because he's right that you're going to have gun deaths, unless you could get rid of all guns. So unless you disagree with that (silly), you either want to get rid of all guns, or you do actually agree with him that we can't be utopianist and, whether you phrase it that way or not, some level of gun deaths are going to come with being a free society.
Yes, but so does context.
https://xcancel.com/Ronxyz00/status/1965872119604289791
"...You're not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen. You can significantly reduce them...we should have an honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, but we should not have a utopian one.
Yes, that was something else he said.
Both things are things that he said. They are not interchangeable.
It's the same fucking 50 second clip.
You can't look at one bit without looking at the rest, since they all build on each other.
I have no clue why you're so attached to this. Charlie Kirk's point was to be realistic, he wasn't endorsing gun deaths, or supporting it. He genuinely condemned all violence, as far as I can tell, and was deeply saddened by political violence, as well as senseless mass shootings and the like.
He would not support the circumstances in his own death.
You can't reason with goalposting shifting, shitlib faggots like Modeler. Save yourself the rage.
Yes, it is. And in that 50 second clip, he says several things.
I’m deeply saddened by violence too, but where he and I disagree is that I don’t think any gun deaths are worth it to protect 2A rights.
That's because you're a nigger faggot pretending to be moderate.
So...abolish the 2nd Amendment?! I want an answer here, do you support gun rights or not?
Because he's right that you're not getting gun deaths to zero. Do you disagree with that?
What exactly is your stance? Because he's right that you're going to have gun deaths, unless you could get rid of all guns. So unless you disagree with that (silly), you either want to get rid of all guns, or you do actually agree with him that we can't be utopianist and, whether you phrase it that way or not, some level of gun deaths are going to come with being a free society.
Who is responsible for most of the gun violence in the US?
Do they use predominantly legal or illegal firearms?