Terrible logic. Soros spent 30+ billion dollars promoting these policies over his lifetime. Is your assertion that his money had little effect? Because he’s the ultra wealthy globalist super villain funding all of these local campaigns. I’m going to assume he knows what he’s doing and is getting proper return on his massive investment.
Terrible logic. Soros spent 30+ billion dollars promoting these policies over his lifetime. Is your assertion that his money had little effect?
Very little of that was spent on "Soros DAs". Soft on crime predated Soros DAs by a long shot. So yes, whatever effect the funding of Soros DAs had is limited. Soros did not create this problem, he exacerbated it.
Partly true, but this was going on long before there was any Soros DA. Soft on crime has been yielding the same result for decades.
Terrible logic. Soros spent 30+ billion dollars promoting these policies over his lifetime. Is your assertion that his money had little effect? Because he’s the ultra wealthy globalist super villain funding all of these local campaigns. I’m going to assume he knows what he’s doing and is getting proper return on his massive investment.
Very little of that was spent on "Soros DAs". Soft on crime predated Soros DAs by a long shot. So yes, whatever effect the funding of Soros DAs had is limited. Soros did not create this problem, he exacerbated it.
I dont know why yall get so put out when people point out that an issue is a bigger problem than yalls narrow view