"Part and Parcel" is a quote from the mayor of London regarding a terrorist attack that had taken place. He said terrorism is just part and parcel to living in a big city. This behavior in the UK should not surprise you.
I have seen no footage of debris even touching building 7. Let alone debris that would cause it to experience what appear to be internal explosions along supports and perfectly collapse into its own footprint.
Please note that there is not only a raging fire in the front of WTC 7, but that it's also damaged, and also the buildings in the foreground have been damaged by debris as well.
Some of the external beams of the main WTC 1 ripped through the face of the side of the building while other debris plummeted through the roof. The damage was extensive enough that it made collapse likely due to the fact that WTC 7 was built with it's outer structure as the main support to fit it's large generator internally. Damage to the face of the building was structural. Damage through the central area damaged all of the floor joists. No jet fuel doesn't turn steel into liquid metal, but what it does do is weaken the structural integrity of steal to the point where it can flex, bend, and warp. Given the the fires (which came from WTC 1's debris) weaking most of the floor joists and supports, and given the damage to the external support structure, and the massive weight of the generator, it made collapse highly likely. Given the severe casualties taken by the NYFD, the fact that the building had been evacuated, the severity of the initial fire, the damage and fires to all of the surrounding buildings, and the inability to safely maneuver through the debris field, WTC 7's fire suppression efforts were abandoned, meaning it's situation continued to decay until it finally collapsed.
"Part and Parcel" is a quote from the mayor of London regarding a terrorist attack that had taken place. He said terrorism is just part and parcel to living in a big city. This behavior in the UK should not surprise you.
Which is easily disproven by other acts that killed even more people.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_Am_Flight_103
I was just thinking that "part and parcel" shouldn't include terrorism regardless of other acts.
Jet fuel can melt steel beams in a building across the street.
That's just the world we live in.
Have to learn the "new physics" too I guess.
Building 7 was ripped apart by debris that was basically a quarter the size of building 7. Building 3 was basically buried by debris.
I have seen no footage of debris even touching building 7. Let alone debris that would cause it to experience what appear to be internal explosions along supports and perfectly collapse into its own footprint.
None of the buildings collapsed into their own footprint. Not one. WTC 1 & 2's collapsed severely damaged all the buildings around the site, impaled the Post office with a 40 foot hole, and managed to cause fires in a nearby hotel. WTC 7 was much closer:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/77/WTC-7_-_Galarza_0368_RAW.jpg
Please note that there is not only a raging fire in the front of WTC 7, but that it's also damaged, and also the buildings in the foreground have been damaged by debris as well.
Some of the external beams of the main WTC 1 ripped through the face of the side of the building while other debris plummeted through the roof. The damage was extensive enough that it made collapse likely due to the fact that WTC 7 was built with it's outer structure as the main support to fit it's large generator internally. Damage to the face of the building was structural. Damage through the central area damaged all of the floor joists. No jet fuel doesn't turn steel into liquid metal, but what it does do is weaken the structural integrity of steal to the point where it can flex, bend, and warp. Given the the fires (which came from WTC 1's debris) weaking most of the floor joists and supports, and given the damage to the external support structure, and the massive weight of the generator, it made collapse highly likely. Given the severe casualties taken by the NYFD, the fact that the building had been evacuated, the severity of the initial fire, the damage and fires to all of the surrounding buildings, and the inability to safely maneuver through the debris field, WTC 7's fire suppression efforts were abandoned, meaning it's situation continued to decay until it finally collapsed.
Yes, thanks for explaining the point of me using that line.
Without your massive brain, nobody would have ever gotten it.
I, for one, enjoyed your sarcasm.
That being said, I genuinely expected people not to know it.
Oh shit, is gitz a bot?
I'm too annoying to be a bot.