A few days ago two Scottish girls were stalked and filmed by vibrant diversity, and one of the girls pulled a knife and an axe as a show of force to make them stop following them.
Women are all over themselves demanding to know why men won't protect them. Enter Andrew Wilson with this post:
Archive: https://archive.is/JhhiC
X: https://x.com/paleochristcon/status/1960384081302110324
It is like someone set off a nuke on X.
Andrew is 100% correct.
Women voted in the governments that penalize men who defend society. America took its philosophy of self defense from Britain before the revolutionary war, but in Britain, self defense has been made all but illegal. Women voted for that, over and over again.
And now, with millions of turd worlders flooding their nations, and bringing their attitudes about SA and rape with them, these women still expect men to defend them, and take the prison sentences when they do?
Nah, ladies. Your mothers and grandmothers voted for this. Take it up with them.
Yes they are, as we've seen in France. Make immigration a women's safety issue.
The fastest way to abort that line of victory before you have a chance to win is to tell women to get raped because they deserve it.
What happened in France to show a hard shift?
After enough rapes and murders, National Rally used it as a propaganda weapon to re-frame Immigration as a "Women's Safety" issue in the public consciousness and got something like a 30 point swing in the approval/disapproval of women towards immigration. It's why the current PM has been lecturing Britain on immigration. The Center-Left has been appealing to anti-immigration sentiment as a result of the right's correct use of propaganda, and the institutional counter-propaganda couldn't stop it.
The National Rally propaganda isn't wrong. It is a Women's Safety issue. It's a safety issue generally, but if framing it as "women's" safety helps, then take the win.
Because women make such rational and smart decisions regarding their safety all the time, especially when long term planning is involved.
They certainly don't regularly think "I can fix him" about literal felons who've already raped and beat them.
I assume this is sarcasm because to me its observably untrue.
And since it's untrue, it's actually the duty of men to protect them, even from their own bad decisions.
The fact that you put your observation up as the proof of something so blatantly true, says more about how worthless your ability to observe is than provide evidence to your side.