That's the only thing with mainstream "anti-israel" sentiment and they defend open borders in the same breath. Then they bluescreen when you point out 1948 was a "mass migration" event with a group that didn't assimilate. Or they wave you aside by just saying "it's different" and reset to the beginning.
They weren't really a unified people, I would imagine. It's been a populated area for pretty much all of recorded history, but it's pretty harsh living conditions, so it was more tribal/clan lands of goat herders and the like than a unified people.
You know, up until the proto-UN came by and said "Yeah, that land you guys have been living on since pre-Biblical times? It's theirs now."
Source: Mostly just stuff I'm figuring based on looking in to how far back "Palestine" exists in writing as a known entity. Which is to say: Back to when hieroglyphics were in vogue.
That's the only thing with mainstream "anti-israel" sentiment and they defend open borders in the same breath. Then they bluescreen when you point out 1948 was a "mass migration" event with a group that didn't assimilate. Or they wave you aside by just saying "it's different" and reset to the beginning.
Palestinians probably had leaders who “didn’t want to appear racist” and held signs saying “welcome refugees”
They weren't really a unified people, I would imagine. It's been a populated area for pretty much all of recorded history, but it's pretty harsh living conditions, so it was more tribal/clan lands of goat herders and the like than a unified people.
You know, up until the proto-UN came by and said "Yeah, that land you guys have been living on since pre-Biblical times? It's theirs now."
Source: Mostly just stuff I'm figuring based on looking in to how far back "Palestine" exists in writing as a known entity. Which is to say: Back to when hieroglyphics were in vogue.