Think AAA gaming is cancer? Roblox says hold my beer.
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
It would be much easier to fight against shit like "age verification" if there weren't so many scumbags out there like Roblox devs taking a shit on the debate stage and giving a ton of ammo to the bad actors who are "thinking of the children".
BINGO.
Call me tinfoil, but with all this censorship/ID happening all at the same time, worldwide...I wouldn't be shocked if these Roblox fucks were in on it; intentionally causing an outrage so they can push more "think of the children" shit to take our rights away.
It's not that out of the question, since we know how interlinked all this tech shit is, with the CIA and In-Q-Tel and the like. Not to mention Epstein and similar rings, since these guys seem like creeps with serious dirty laundry.
Roblox doesn't even have to be in on the conspiracy. All you have to do as John Government, is find a nice, kid-appealing place that's prime hunting ground for predators. Then you look the other way to let everything ferment and fester. And once you're ready to present your "solution" you expose how terrible things you let things get and go "Here's my new law that makes this bad thing EXTRA illegal! (And helps us spy on you easier.)"
My point is, they're handling things in the most clownishly bad ways possible. If they're not doing it on purpose they're like the most retarded people in history.
Also, it sounds like they're restricting some aspects of Roblox to 17+ ID-verification, I just saw that. So, yeah, they're "fixing" their issues with ID. Wow, shocking.
Possible, but I think it's something even simpler. They're never going to have the manpower to get rid of all of it. If they admit it's an issue and start trying to address it, they've taken responsibility. And taking responsibility is a liability. (Thanks lawyers!)
If they deny deny deny, they can walk into every lawsuit claiming it's shocking to them that whatever happened on their platform. There is a monetary incentive to downplay it instead of doing the moral thing. Hell, if they did the right thing, they'd probably get sued by their shareholders for opening themselves up to the liability.
The problem alot of people have when articulating a conspiracy is that they fall into the trap of believing it requires active participation. It's far more likely and efficient that the government knows and allows a bad actor to keep going to advance an agenda rather than active cooperation
Almost as though that’s literally the point and they’re literally the same people who want the restrictions in the first place, as proven and admitted by every single one of them every other time this has come up.
Oh well, guess we better just not do anything whatsoever and continue talking to subhuman demons as though talking has ever actually fixed a problem in human history, simply because they told us to do it!