I think there's a kernel of truth to what he's saying.
But I also think that he's reflexively throwing in the "women are gullible morons susceptible to AI simping BUT don't actually want to fuck it" waiver because the core tenet of his redpill content is based on the idea that being a "bad boy" is how to create female attraction.
Again, not saying he's wrong about that either, but I think he's also shoehorning it into this hypothetical to stay consistent with messaging to protect his brand.
Those aren't mutually exclusive. The scum women like that are attracted to are great at love bombing. That's part of the whole process. "Damn girl I've never been so in love, you're the most beautiful woman I've ever seen, I wanna build a new life with you" and so forth. Then the woman lets him raw dog her (because it's TRUE LOVE THIS TIME even though we just met 15 minutes ago) and he vanishes forever. Or maybe he does stick around and treats her like shit, but every so often he'll love bomb her again and it'll undo all the abuse and neglect.
This is the MO literally 100% of the time. The left half of the female bell curve falls for love bombing no matter how obvious and hackneyed, and they fall for it every time.
hoe_math's core work, the Zones chart, is based on the concept that women only respond to "love bombing" from men that they are already attracted to (ie. dudes with bad boy traits).
His Zones chart tries to demonstrate that pouring resources (ie. being nice) to a woman who has no attraction to you will never change that fact no matter the investment.
The AI has the capacity to pour adulation, but it can't really fulfill the bad boy carnal attraction bit.
I think the AI boyfriend example would be better framed that a good chunk of women eat up & are addicted to social media attention. Which feeds their ego & their pleasure centers, but doesn't really replace sexual attraction.
I don't think any of these women are experiencing even the slightest bit of sexual attraction here. It's all just validation. If they couldn't show off their pretend boy toys none of them would be doing this.
The problem is, they're not aware of it. The AI boyfriend is an excuse to run to Reddit and get upvotes and ass pats, but they don't understand second order effects so they're attributing the dopamine rush to the AI, not the validation.
Hear that simps? They still find you repulsive. They'll still scam you for resources though.
I think there's a kernel of truth to what he's saying.
But I also think that he's reflexively throwing in the "women are gullible morons susceptible to AI simping BUT don't actually want to fuck it" waiver because the core tenet of his redpill content is based on the idea that being a "bad boy" is how to create female attraction.
Again, not saying he's wrong about that either, but I think he's also shoehorning it into this hypothetical to stay consistent with messaging to protect his brand.
Those aren't mutually exclusive. The scum women like that are attracted to are great at love bombing. That's part of the whole process. "Damn girl I've never been so in love, you're the most beautiful woman I've ever seen, I wanna build a new life with you" and so forth. Then the woman lets him raw dog her (because it's TRUE LOVE THIS TIME even though we just met 15 minutes ago) and he vanishes forever. Or maybe he does stick around and treats her like shit, but every so often he'll love bomb her again and it'll undo all the abuse and neglect.
This is the MO literally 100% of the time. The left half of the female bell curve falls for love bombing no matter how obvious and hackneyed, and they fall for it every time.
hoe_math's core work, the Zones chart, is based on the concept that women only respond to "love bombing" from men that they are already attracted to (ie. dudes with bad boy traits).
His Zones chart tries to demonstrate that pouring resources (ie. being nice) to a woman who has no attraction to you will never change that fact no matter the investment.
The AI has the capacity to pour adulation, but it can't really fulfill the bad boy carnal attraction bit.
I think the AI boyfriend example would be better framed that a good chunk of women eat up & are addicted to social media attention. Which feeds their ego & their pleasure centers, but doesn't really replace sexual attraction.
I don't think any of these women are experiencing even the slightest bit of sexual attraction here. It's all just validation. If they couldn't show off their pretend boy toys none of them would be doing this.
The problem is, they're not aware of it. The AI boyfriend is an excuse to run to Reddit and get upvotes and ass pats, but they don't understand second order effects so they're attributing the dopamine rush to the AI, not the validation.