Because he's a bad faith actor... I pointed out in different instances why he shouldn't support Microsoft if he hated feminism or how Spain is a feminist shithole, all he did was to try to shift blame and dismiss me...
Everyone argues like that.
Why should be allowed here? Is there anything of value in his posts other than making stormfags mald?
Who would remain if you had to provide added value to be allowed to post here?
That's the issue, it wasn't an argument. He demanded shit, pointed out wrong shit and when you clarified he was factually wrong he accused you of being a woman supporter...
Who would remain if you had to provide added value to be allowed to post here?
Look at it this way. We may complain about stormfags here already. Now imagine if every posts was just joos bad
That's the issue, it wasn't an argument. He demanded shit, pointed out wrong shit and when you clarified he was factually wrong he accused you of being a woman supporter...
It's not great, but you're pointing out something of which everyone else is also guilty. You want a list of the weird people I've discussed things with, and how bizarrely they act? You can't propose a rule that applies to only one person.
Look at it this way. We may complain about stormfags here already. Now imagine if every posts was just joos bad
It's not? All kidding aside, this rule of "you have to provide added value" clearly doesn't apply to everyone else, so why should it apply to him?
I'm not proposing a rule. I'm saying he offers nothing of value. Tell me how the discussion here would've improved if he was able to post here for they past months he has been banned.
And you know users here have already been banned for less
And I'm saying that this holds equally true of the rest of us.
And you know users here have already been banned for less
I don't actually. Maybe he does show bad faith in discussions (it's hard to expect otherwise given his massive blind spots), but in my opinion, he has always tried to follow the rules - which others flout.
Everyone argues like that.
Who would remain if you had to provide added value to be allowed to post here?
That's the issue, it wasn't an argument. He demanded shit, pointed out wrong shit and when you clarified he was factually wrong he accused you of being a woman supporter...
Look at it this way. We may complain about stormfags here already. Now imagine if every posts was just joos bad
It's not great, but you're pointing out something of which everyone else is also guilty. You want a list of the weird people I've discussed things with, and how bizarrely they act? You can't propose a rule that applies to only one person.
It's not? All kidding aside, this rule of "you have to provide added value" clearly doesn't apply to everyone else, so why should it apply to him?
I'm not proposing a rule. I'm saying he offers nothing of value. Tell me how the discussion here would've improved if he was able to post here for they past months he has been banned.
And you know users here have already been banned for less
And I'm saying that this holds equally true of the rest of us.
I don't actually. Maybe he does show bad faith in discussions (it's hard to expect otherwise given his massive blind spots), but in my opinion, he has always tried to follow the rules - which others flout.