Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

82
Looks like Pam Bondi will be the first scapegoat for the failed Epstein coverup (twitter.com)
posted 347 days ago by The_Shadow_of_Intent 347 days ago by The_Shadow_of_Intent +82 / -0
37 comments share
37 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
▲ 21 ▼
– SR388-SAX 21 points 347 days ago +21 / -0

Scapegoat? She seems to be the actual culprit, or at the very least the most cowardly cover-her-ass careerist in the group to allow it to explode in this miasma of failure.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– deleted 27 points 347 days ago +27 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Fistmagic 5 points 347 days ago +5 / -0

It doesn't seem real but it is rael

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 347 days ago +5 / -0
▲ 18 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent [S] 18 points 347 days ago +18 / -0

In my mind the calculus is simple: Trump ran on putting America First and took a bullet for it, but the Israelis yanked his leash as soon as he touched the Epstein material.

Why would he go along with that when he has "nothing to lose"? Because they told him that if he reveals the Epstein files then our system as we know it will collapse and he won't be able to enact the rest of his agenda. Trump made a pragmatic (wrong) choice and decided Epstein wasn't worth losing deportations, tariffs, two genders, destruction of USAID, etc.

Is Trump himself implicated? I don't think so because he consistently pushed Epstein for years, unprompted. To push for the disclosure of himself as a child molester as some kind of power gambit, even as a bluff, would be the most insane thing anyone has done in politics.

The other darker possibility is that he was always some kind of zogbot Manchurian candidate and he fully intended to pull the football from Charlie Brown the entire time. The reason I don't believe this is because he was 100% going to be killed on live television if it weren't for God turning his head.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– What_password 11 points 347 days ago +11 / -0

I definitely believe Trump would not reveal anything if he thought the harm to the country or his plan was too great. I also recall something about how he wouldn't do anything to a former president like arrest them. I could be wrong there, but I think he holds the office in too high esteem and wouldn't want to damage it (further).

I think the upside is this has really caused a firestorm and we may see some good out of it. I'm willing to wait a little bit to see what happens, though I'm pretty pissed at how its been handled.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– subbookkeeper 6 points 347 days ago +6 / -0

Why would he go along with that when he has "nothing to lose"? Because they told him that if he reveals the Epstein files then our system as we know it will collapse and he won't be able to enact the rest of his agenda. Trump made a pragmatic (wrong) choice and decided Epstein wasn't worth losing deportations, tariffs, two genders, destruction of USAID, etc.

Is Trump himself implicated? I don't think so because he consistently pushed Epstein for years, unprompted. To push for the disclosure of himself as a child molester as some kind of power gambit, even as a bluff, would be the most insane thing anyone has done in politics.

The other darker possibility is that he was always some kind of zogbot Manchurian candidate and he fully intended to pull the football from Charlie Brown the entire time. The reason I don't believe this is because he was 100% going to be killed on live television if it weren't for God turning his head.

Probably the single best assumption about this I've read on this forum. There's so much obvious shit that people post it's obvious normally serious people are obviously emotionally freaking out.

I think it's obvious "something" has happened behind the scenes. I don't know how much family these people have but (to me at least) the obvious thing for the intelligence agencies is just too threaten their families.

I think a far more likely scenario is something like this: Pam Bondi is at her desk and a non descript man in a suit delivers a manilla folder full of files and says "This is the files on Epstein that concern you" and the top file is a list of all her families banking login details, pin codes, personal electronic data. And a photo of them sleeping in their bed with a man pointing a gun at them. Or something along those lines.

In case the implication isn't clear, if they don't play ball they will kill their entire family.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Agenda47 6 points 347 days ago +6 / -0

Why does Bondi go along with it, or not try to defend her rep here?

I sure hope there's a Plan B.

Is Trump himself implicated? I don't think so because he consistently pushed Epstein for years, unprompted. To push for the disclosure of himself as a child molester as some kind of power gambit, even as a bluff, would be the most insane thing anyone has done in politics.

Yes based on everything that's happened in the past decade I find that even less likely than the zogbot Manchurian candidate angle. Either way I don't think it could possibly be something as simple as "oh boy he's on the list guys!"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– LibertyPrimeWasRight 6 points 347 days ago +6 / -0

I don’t think it’s even a matter of “Trump would have to be a crazy bluffer.” If Trump was implicated in the Epstein stuff, why did that get sat on for the entire past decade of him getting targeted by every political institution and hit job and leak they could throw at him? What would be the point of collecting blackmail if no one is going to use it on someone like Trump? Even if you take the most cynical view of “Trump doesn’t care for Americans, he’s just a narcissist that wants to become the counter-elite so he can go in the history books as a president,” surely putting a leash on potential rogue elites is half the point of a blackmail operation?

The only way one can answer that is by saying this whole thing has been an Israeli (or whoever you want to say has the files) plan from day one to… replace their fairly stable, compliant, captured parties with Trump? To say that Trump is still more compliant with certain globalist aims and ideals than would be preferable is understandable. To suggest that he and all the attendant Overton Window shifts his movement has brought is actually more in line with their wants than the Hillary Clinton DNC vs Jeb Bush GOP paradigm he dismantled is certifiable.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– subbookkeeper 5 points 347 days ago +5 / -0

If someone says to me "It's because Trump is on the list" I know the person genuinely has trouble connecting with reality in major ways. It's actually funny because it implies that Trump presumably that he was on the list. You know, sometimes you forget the details of trips you take, the ones to those secret islands where you fuck kids. Happens to us all right?

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy